Michael Rabb, a 77-year-old US military veteran, was found guilty of carrying a sign supporting Hamas at a protest in South Yorkshire. The protest was held outside Sheffield City Hall on October 21, 2023, over the ongoing Hamas/Israel conflict. Rabb’s homemade sign read “Stand With Hamas, End Israel, Free Palestine.” He was sentenced to a £1,000 fine, £930 in costs, and a £400 surcharge, totaling over £2,300. The judge warned Rabb that he may be in contempt of court if he refused to pay within seven days.
Hamas is a proscribed organization under the Terrorism Act, and Rabb’s sign was found to potentially arouse reasonable suspicion that he was a member or supporter of the group. However, the prosecution stated that it was not necessary for Rabb to show support for Hamas to participate in the peaceful protest. Rabb, who served as a fighter pilot for the US Navy in Vietnam, maintained that he knew what it was like to be involved in military action and had been actively working to free Palestine.
Despite having shown no remorse or regret for his actions, Rabb insisted that his protest was a legitimate act of civil disobedience and a peaceful non-violent public protest. He believed that it was critical to stand with Hamas in order to support the people of Palestine, especially in light of the mass murder and genocide he claimed was being carried out by the state of Israel. Rabb described his arrest and prosecution under the Terrorism Act as an attempt to shut down dissent and labeled it as arbitrary.
During his sentencing, Rabb told the court that he was a US citizen and a veteran with a small military pension and social security as his means of living. He had previously been to Gaza, been in prison in Israel, and deported for his activism in support of Palestine. Despite his exemplary character and previous good standing, Rabb remained steadfast in his refusal to pay the fines and costs imposed by the judge. Rabb’s actions and beliefs reflect his deep commitment to the cause of supporting Hamas and advocating for the freedom of Palestine, even in the face of legal consequences.
The court heard that Rabb had been approached by a uniformed police officer at the protest after causing distress among organizers with his sign. While he initially left the protest after being spoken to about the sign, he later returned, leading to his arrest. Rabb’s steadfast support for Hamas and his refusal to back down from his stance was evident throughout the court proceedings, where he defended his actions as a form of legitimate protest and civil disobedience. Despite the judge’s warnings and the potential consequences he faced, Rabb remained resolute in his belief that standing with Hamas was the right and just course of action in light of the ongoing conflict in the region.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
18 Comments
I think freedom of expression should always be protected, no matter the message.
I cant believe hes standing firm on this! Is he serious?
Yes, hes dead serious. Whether you agree or not, hes sticking to his guns. Its refreshing to see someone unapologetically stand their ground. Respect for that kind of conviction, even if its not popular.
I think he has the right to protest, even if its controversial.
Absolutely, freedom of speech is crucial. But theres a fine line between protesting and inciting violence or hatred. Its important to consider the impact of controversial protests on society as a whole.
I think the veteran has a right to free speech, even if its controversial.
Why should he pay a fine for showing support? Freedom of speech, anyone?
I think he has the right to express his views, even if controversial.
Why should a veteran be fined for freedom of expression? Outrageous!
Veterans are not above the law. Freedom of expression does not give anyone the right to break rules or disrespect others. Fines are imposed for valid reasons. Respect the law, even if you disagree with it.
I cant believe he wont pay the fine! What do you all think?
I respect his convictions, but should we condone supporting a designated terrorist organization?
This veterans protest raises questions about free speech and political expression.
This veterans protest raises questions about free speech and patriotism. What do you think?
I believe protesting is the purest form of patriotism. Its about holding our leaders accountable and fighting for what we believe in. Free speech is a fundamental right, even if it makes some people uncomfortable. These veterans are exercising their rights and thats something to be respected.
Should free speech protect all forms of expression, even controversial ones?
Absolutely, free speech should protect all forms of expression, even controversial ones. It is essential for a truly democratic society to allow for dissenting opinions and challenging ideas. Censorship only serves to stifle important discussions and hinder progress. Embrace the diversity of perspectives.
I dont understand why he wont just pay the fine. Seems stubborn.