Samantha Dittmer, 64, was originally charged with the second-degree murder of Jesse McPhee, a 37-year-old longshoreman who was shot and killed at point-blank range with a hunting rifle in their shared home on Aug. 29, 2021. In October, after a four-week trial, a jury convicted Dittmer of the lesser offence of manslaughter based on her careless use of a firearm.
“The trauma I felt watching my son die in front of my eyes is unbearable,” she said. “And I am so sorry that happened. … If I could take it all back I would. No one is going to miss him more than me. I am very very sad.”
Both Crown and defence asked for the four-year prison sentence, which is the mandatory minimum sentence for a manslaughter committed with a firearm.
Justice Margot Fleming said although she did not consider Dittmer to be a credible witness, she believes Dittmer did not intend to kill her son. Based on the evidence, Fleming was satisfied that Dittmer committed the unlawful act of careless use of a firearm. She found that Dittmer’s handling of the rifle was objectively dangerous and a significant contributing cause of McPhee’s death.
The trial heard that Dittmer moved to Port Alberni from the Lower Mainland several years ago. She planned to sell her house in Tsawwassen where McPhee was living with his wife and two young children and have everyone live with her.
However, McPhee and his wife went through a bitter and painful separation. There were arson attempts on the home in Tsawwassen and McPhee was beaten up and injured. Eventually, he and his new partner, Brandy Kazakoff, moved to Port Alberni, and lived on the main floor of Dittmer’s house.
The trial heard that McPhee was trying to teach his mother self-defence. He would sneak up behind her and slide his thumbnail across her throat, which she found unnerving. In the summer of 2021, McPhee was violent, erratic and never sober.
McPhee was not able to cope with his separation and was completely dependent on his mother. As a result, Dittmer was extremely stressed and unwell. She had dangerously high blood pressure and was experiencing panic attacks. Her doctor referred her to Port Alberni mental health.
On Aug. 29, 2021, Dittmer, Kazakoff and McPhee went to Great Central Lake to check on crayfish traps. McPhee drank a lot of beer. The women were also drinking.
Back at home, Dittmer was stressed and asked her son for a hug. McPhee hugged her so hard he hurt her and whispered in her ear that maybe he should just put her out of her misery.
Returning home, she grabbed the rifle without doing any safety checks and walked downstairs into McPhee’s suite. He was standing there looking away. Dittmer decided to put rifle down and walk away quietly.
“All of a sudden, there was some kind of physical contact between Mr. McPhee and Miss Dittmer caused by him suddenly rushing towards her. The rifle discharged during this contact, the muzzle pushing or pressing against his chest. He was shot and landed face down on the floor,” Fleming said.
An autopsy found that McPhee’s blood alcohol level was two-and-a-half times the legal limit.
Although Dittmer testified that she never had her finger on the trigger, Fleming said she was satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that Dittmer caused the rifle to fire by pulling the trigger accidentally during the sudden physical contact with McPhee.
“He could not have pulled the trigger. The trigger had to be pulled. And her evidence denying she pulled the trigger is completely unreliable. Her memory is very poor, fragmented and somewhat inconsistent,” Fleming said.
Although McPhee was not functioning well, his violent death is a tragic loss to those who knew and loved him, including his two daughters, his stepsister and his mother.
“He was not only troubled, he was passionately alive, loving and very creative,” said Fleming.
Although Dittmer spoke about how much she loved her son and never intended to harm him, she did not take responsibility or express remorse for the shooting, said the judge. Rather, Dittmer said: “If people think I was careless because I didn’t think it was loaded, well, I guess I was.”
The judge found Dittmer’s moral blameworthiness was reduced by her emotional and psychological distress.
Dittmer was also ordered to provide a DNA sample to the national database and is banned from owning firearms for 10 years after release.
Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the news you need to know — add VancouverSun.com and TheProvince.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here.
You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber: For just $14 a month, you can get unlimited access to The Vancouver Sun, The Province, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. Support us by subscribing today: The Vancouver Sun | The Province.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
14 Comments
Can we really trust the justice system when it comes to cases like this?
Do you think the sentence was fair or too lenient? Lets discuss!
I cant believe the sentence was only four years. Justice system fail!
Should the sentence have been harsher? What do you guys think?
This sentence seems too harsh for a mother who lost her child.
Why only four years for taking a life? Justice system needs reform.
What a tragic story. Do you think the sentence was fair or too lenient?
This sentence seems too lenient for such a serious crime.
Are you kidding me? This sentence seems too lenient? Its a serious crime! The punishment should fit the crime, not be a slap on the wrist. Justice needs to be served properly. This leniency is unacceptable.
Do you think the sentence was fair or too lenient? Lets discuss!
This sentence seems too lenient for such a tragic crime. Justice served?
I cant believe she only got four years! Justice system is messed up.
Its a shame how lenient the justice system can be at times. Some people get off too easily while others face harsher consequences for minor offenses. Its frustrating, but unfortunately, its a reality we have to deal with.
Should the justice system be more lenient towards mothers in cases like this?