Chastanet and Felix Depart from the Constitutional Review Committee

Opposition Leader Allen Chastanet and Choiseul MP Bradly Felix have decided to step down from the Constitutional Review Committee due to Chastanet’s concerns about the committee’s ability to advise on constitutional amendments. Chastanet raised doubts about the committee’s authority to make recommendations and questioned the legal basis for their assessments, emphasizing the need for legal expertise to validate proposed amendments. He also mentioned a misinterpretation regarding the participation of MPs in the committee, leading to their decision to withdraw from the process.

Chastanet indicated his intention to seek clarification from the Attorney General regarding the committee’s legality, expressing uncertainty about its foundation. In addition to procedural concerns, he highlighted broader reservations about the approach to constitutional reform, emphasizing the importance of a thorough review process. Chastanet expressed doubts about the current methodology’s efficacy in addressing constitutional intricacies, suggesting that a more rigorous and comprehensive examination of constitutional provisions is necessary.

The Opposition Leader stressed the need for a serious review of the Constitution, pointing out that there are many assumptions that are made and advocating for a more detailed approach to constitutional reform. He emphasized the importance of taking the process seriously and ensuring that all aspects of the Constitution are thoroughly examined. Chastanet’s decision to step down from the committee was driven by his belief that a more robust and comprehensive review process is needed to address constitutional issues effectively.

Chastanet’s decision to withdraw from the Constitutional Review Committee reflects his concerns about the committee’s ability to advise on constitutional amendments. He highlighted the need for legal expertise to validate proposed amendments and questioned the committee’s authority to make recommendations. This move underscores Chastanet’s broader reservations about the current approach to constitutional reform and his advocacy for a more rigorous and comprehensive examination of constitutional provisions. By stepping down from the committee, Chastanet is calling for a more serious review of the Constitution to ensure that all aspects are thoroughly examined and addressed.