Beatrijs Penn, a student at St. Stephen’s College at the University of Alberta, won a legal battle against the college after being expelled for unconventional advice about antidepressants. The Alberta Court of Appeal found that the college treated her unfairly by not allowing her to adequately review a video clip of a client session that was the primary reason for her termination. Penn, who had worked as a registered psychotherapist in the Netherlands for over 30 years before moving to Canada, suggested during the session that antidepressants caused brain damage and dementia and shared her personal views on pharmaceuticals.
Penn’s expulsion stemmed from a 20-minute video clip of a client session where she expressed her opinions on mental health medication and shared recommendations from other patients. Despite not explicitly telling the client to avoid medication, Penn’s views were deemed controversial by the college. After going through multiple internal appeals and judicial reviews, Penn’s case made its way to the Alberta Court of Appeal, where she ultimately succeeded due to the college’s mishandling of the video evidence. The court faulted the college for not finding a way to address privacy concerns and allow Penn to view the video, which was essential to her defense.
The Court of Appeal declined to order a new hearing as Penn no longer wishes to return to the college. However, it suggested that St. Stephen’s College apologize to Penn, although it could not mandate that. Penn also won the right to submit an affidavit from the client involved in the session, who stated that she never felt pressured by Penn regarding antidepressants. The court will determine the legal costs owed to Penn by the college in a later hearing. St. Stephen’s College, originally founded to train ministers, is now a multi-faith institution that educates individuals for professional caregiving and ministry roles.
In addition to her legal battle with St. Stephen’s College, Penn was also a victim of fraud in a separate case involving Ross Vincent Bayne and Mary Cooney. The two were convicted of defrauding Penn of nearly $350,000 under the pretense of loans for humanitarian projects. They are scheduled to be sentenced on May 9. Despite the challenges she faced, Penn’s victory in the court case highlights the importance of procedural fairness and the need for institutions to handle disciplinary matters transparently and equitably.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
29 Comments
I think the college was right to expel the student for those comments.
I cant believe they expelled him for that! Freedom of speech, anyone? #ridiculous
This is ridiculous! Freedom of speech should not be limited, even in college.
Actually, freedom of speech comes with responsibility. Colleges have a duty to maintain a respectful and inclusive environment for all students. Limiting hate speech is necessary to protect vulnerable groups and promote a safe learning environment. Prioritizing empathy over free speech is essential.
I think colleges should focus on mental health support, not punishment for comments.
I think colleges should have the right to expel students for controversial comments.
Absolutely not. Colleges should be places of intellectual discourse and debate, not echo chambers. Freedom of speech is a fundamental right, even when its uncomfortable. Expelling students for controversial comments sets a dangerous precedent and stifles academic freedom.
I think colleges should have the right to expel students for harmful comments.
Absolutely not. Freedom of speech should be protected on college campuses. Expelling students for expressing their opinions, no matter how harmful, sets a dangerous precedent. Instead, colleges should focus on educating students about respectful communication and fostering a culture of open dialogue.
I think colleges should have the right to discipline students for harmful comments.
Absolutely not. Colleges should not be in the business of policing speech. Free expression is essential on campuses for fostering diverse viewpoints and critical thinking. Disciplining students for comments, no matter how harmful, sets a dangerous precedent for censorship and stifles intellectual growth.
I dont think students should be expelled for expressing opinions. Freedom of speech, right?
Should colleges have the right to expel students for their personal opinions?
Absolutely. Colleges should prioritize creating a safe and inclusive environment for all students. If someones personal opinions promote hate or discrimination, they should face consequences. Freedom of speech doesnt mean freedom from accountability.
Do you think colleges should have the right to expel students over personal opinions?
Absolutely. Colleges have the right to maintain a safe and inclusive environment for all students. If someones personal opinions promote hate or discrimination, they should face consequences. Free speech doesnt mean freedom from accountability.
Should colleges have the right to expel students for personal comments?
Do you think colleges should have the right to expel students over personal comments?
Absolutely, colleges should have the right to uphold their standards and values by expelling students over inappropriate personal comments. Freedom of speech doesnt mean freedom from consequences. Its about time people learn that actions have repercussions.
Should colleges have the right to expel students for expressing personal opinions?
Absolutely, colleges should be able to expel students for expressing harmful or discriminatory opinions. Freedom of speech doesnt mean freedom from consequences. Its important to create a safe and inclusive environment for all students, and that sometimes means taking action against those who promote hate or intolerance.
Should colleges have the authority to expel students over personal comments?
Why should a student be expelled for expressing their opinion? Seems unfair to me.
If expressing an opinion violates the code of conduct or creates a hostile environment, expulsion may be justified. Students must understand the consequences of their actions. Freedom of speech doesnt mean freedom from consequences. Rules exist for a reason.
Isnt freedom of speech important, even if it offends? Lets discuss!
Can colleges dictate personal opinions? Freedom of speech vs. academic discipline debate.
Colleges have the right to enforce academic standards, but stifling personal opinions goes against freedom of speech. Students should be encouraged to express diverse viewpoints, even if they challenge the status quo. Academic discipline shouldnt silence critical thinking.
Do you think colleges should have the right to expel students over personal opinions?
Absolutely. Colleges have a responsibility to maintain a safe and inclusive environment for all students. If someones personal opinions promote hate, discrimination, or harm to others, then expulsion may be necessary to protect the well-being of the campus community.