The Central Planning Authority (CPA) is set to review an application from Casabella Development Ltd. for a subdivision with over 250 residential lots in the area of Frank Sound Road near the Jacques Scott liquor store. The National Roads Authority (NRA) has requested the developer to contribute to the construction of lanes on the future East-West Arterial corridor for alternative access to the development. They also emphasized the need for a comprehensive phasing plan and additional access points to the development to address potential flooding issues.
After initial comments from various agencies, including the Department of Environment (DoE) and the Water Authority, the applicant made amendments and provided a phasing plan that addressed concerns raised by the NRA. The DoE highlighted the unique habitat on the proposed site and recommended the implementation of a phasing plan with specific build-out triggers to protect the wetland ecosystem until development is imminent. The Water Authority requested stormwater drainage wells to protect the North Side freshwater lens.
In addition to agency comments, there is one objector to the development who raised concerns about vehicular rights of way and safety issues related to road access. They requested more information from planning authorities before the development proceeds. The proposed plan will be discussed at the upcoming CPA meeting, where all these concerns and recommendations will be addressed. The meeting is scheduled for April 3, 2024, and will take place at the Government Administration Building in George Town.
Overall, the development proposal for the subdivision has elicited various comments and recommendations from different agencies and an objector. The applicant has made amendments to address concerns raised, particularly regarding stormwater control, phasing plans, and access points. The DoE and Water Authority have recommended measures to protect the unique habitat and freshwater lens in the area. The objector has raised concerns about vehicular rights of way and safety issues related to road access, emphasizing the need for clarity before the development proceeds.
The upcoming CPA meeting on April 3, 2024, will provide an opportunity to discuss and address all the comments, recommendations, and objections related to the proposed subdivision. It is essential for the developer to comply with the conditions set by the various agencies and address the concerns raised by the objector to ensure a seamless and environmentally conscious development process. The meeting will be a crucial step in determining the future of the subdivision and ensuring that all aspects of the project are thoroughly reviewed and evaluated.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
23 Comments
Shouldnt we prioritize green spaces over more residential lots? Just a thought 🌳
Why do we need more residential lots? Lets focus on green spaces instead!
Why do we need more residential lots? Lets focus on green spaces instead!
Residential lots are crucial for addressing housing shortages and providing homes for families. Green spaces are important too, but we need a balance. Lets prioritize both housing and nature to create a sustainable and livable community for everyone.
Why are they building more residential lots when the traffic is already terrible?
Why are we building more houses when we should be focusing on green spaces?!
While green spaces are important, we also need housing for the growing population. Its about finding a balance. We can prioritize green initiatives in urban planning, but we cant ignore the need for more housing options. Both are essential for a sustainable future.
Shouldnt the CPA consider the impact on wildlife in the area too?
Is the CPA considering environmental impact in the review process?
Of course not, the CPA is too busy counting dollars to care about the environment. Money talks, the planet walks. Business as usual, unfortunately.
Shouldnt we consider environmental impact before approving such a large development?
Should CPA consider environmental impact before approving residential lots?
Shouldnt we prioritize environmental impact over residential expansion? Just a thought!
Why do they always want to build on open spaces? Let nature be!
I wonder if these new residential lots will bring in more traffic jams.
More traffic jams mean more opportunities for businesses to thrive. Embrace the growth and hustle of a bustling community. Life is too short to worry about a few extra minutes in traffic. Change your perspective and see the potential in the chaos.
Shouldnt community input be considered before approving such a large residential development?
Why should the community have a say in every decision? Trust the experts and developers to make the best choices for progress. Too much input leads to stagnant growth. Lets embrace change and innovation without constant interference.
Isnt the CPA taking too long to review? Lets get those lots approved already!
Hey, patience is key when it comes to regulatory processes. Rushing approvals could lead to oversights or mistakes that impact the community. Lets trust the CPA to do their due diligence and ensure that the lots are approved properly for everyones benefit.
Should CPA consider environmental impact before approving residential lots?
I wonder if this will lead to better infrastructure or more congestion?
I cant believe theyre considering that many lots in one go. Madness!