Patrick McKeown from Worthing, West Sussex, was the first XL Bully owner to be prosecuted under the new law which banned such breeds of dogs. Despite insisting that his dog, Sully, was “great with kids,” McKeown failed to comply with the legislation by not applying for an exemption, having the dog neutered, or obtaining third-party insurance. The police found the dog in McKeown’s backyard during an unrelated visit to his home, leading to his appearance in Worthing Magistrates Court, where he pleaded guilty to possessing a fighting dog.
As a result of his actions, McKeown was sentenced to a one-year community order, requiring him to complete 100 hours of unpaid work. He was also ordered to pay £85 in costs and a £114 surcharge. Additionally, an order was imposed for the destruction of the dog, pending an appeal. This case was the first of its kind in West Sussex following the introduction of the new laws. Chief Inspector Simon Starns emphasized the importance of dog owners complying with the legislation to ensure public safety and reduce the risk associated with dangerous dogs.
The increase in dog attacks in the UK prompted the government to implement a ban on XL Bully-type breeds, including the XL Bully. This breed was categorized as one of the banned dangerous dogs, making it a criminal offense to own one without an exemption certificate. The legislation came into effect on February 1, in response to the rising number of dog attacks and fatalities caused by these breeds. The police aim to send a message to all dog owners across the UK to adhere to the new laws and prioritize responsible dog ownership.
Sussex Police’s Chief Inspector Starns emphasized the importance of dog owners complying with the government guidance on XL Bully breed dogs to ensure public safety. The legislation requires these dogs to be muzzled and kept on a lead by someone aged over 16 when in public places. The police recorded over 80 incidents of dog attacks per day, with a significant increase from the previous year. The prosecution of Patrick McKeown for owning an XL Bully dog without proper compliance with the law is intended to set an example for other dog owners.
McKeown expressed his disappointment at the loss of his dog, Sully, who he described as “amazing” and good with children. Despite his positive experience with the dog, he acknowledged that the law must be followed. The destruction of Sully highlights the seriousness of owning banned dog breeds without the necessary legal requirements. By making an example of McKeown’s case, authorities aim to raise awareness among dog owners about the importance of responsible ownership and compliance with dangerous dog laws. The prosecution serves as a deterrent to others who may be considering owning banned breeds without following the legal protocol.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
14 Comments
I dont see the problem, appearance doesnt equal behavior. Give the dog a chance!
I think appearance doesnt determine a dogs behavior. Lets focus on training instead.
I dont buy it! XL Bully or not, safety always comes first.
I think appearance doesnt define a dogs behavior, its all about training and love.
I mean, whos to say a big dog cant be gentle? Lets not judge! 🐶
Big dogs can absolutely be gentle, but size does matter in certain situations. Its about responsible ownership and understanding the capabilities of the breed. Lets not ignore the fact that proper training and socialization are key factors in ensuring all dogs, regardless of size, behave appropriately.
I think appearance shouldnt determine a dogs behavior. Lets not judge based on looks!
I dont buy it, a dogs breed doesnt determine its behavior!
I disagree, appearance can be misleading. Safety first! What do you think?
Appearance can definitely be deceiving. Its naive to trust solely based on looks. Safety should always be the top priority. Trust your instincts and stay cautious. What matters is whats beneath the surface. Stay vigilant and stay safe.
Do looks matter more than behavior? Discussing XL Bully owners perspective.
Appearance doesnt define behavior – should we judge a book by its cover?
I understand wanting to defend your pet, but laws are laws.
Should appearance dictate behavior judgment of dogs? Interesting debate, what do you think?