Florida businesswoman Alexandra Smyth was sentenced to six months of home confinement after admitting to taking advantage of her Virgin Islands clients following hurricanes Irma and Maria. Smyth, 36, entered a last-minute plea agreement in September 2023, as she faced charges of wire fraud for diverting payments owed to the IRS by taxpayers who used her business to prepare their taxes. Prosecutors revealed that five fraud victims collectively lost $41,144.72 as a result of Smyth’s actions.
During the sentencing hearing, Smyth’s defense attorney presented envelopes containing money orders for four clients of Smyth’s accounting business, Perfect Balance Accounting Services, LLC, and one intended beneficiary of a hurricane recovery charity called Perfect Heart that Smyth had set up. Chief District Judge Robert Molloy commended Smyth for making restitution before the court, calling it an act of accepting responsibility. However, the government, represented by Assistant Attorney General Everard Potter, argued that the payments made by Smyth did not fully cover the amount owed and requested a jail sentence of three months.
Smyth apologized to her victims, acknowledging that she made poor choices as an adult but expressing her desire for a sentence other than prison. While Smyth cited survival and maintaining her business as reasons for her actions, Judge Molloy criticized her rationale and ordered six months of home confinement, as well as an additional 36 months of supervised release. Smyth was also instructed to pay for electronic monitors to ensure compliance with the home confinement and to pay the remaining restitution in monthly installments at ten percent of her monthly gross earnings.
The judge noted that Smyth had used her skills and training to violate multiple individuals and commended her for paying restitution, which is uncommon in financial crimes. However, Molloy emphasized the seriousness of Smyth’s offenses and the need to take a hard look at them. Despite Smyth’s attempts to explain her reasons for cheating her clients, the judge found her explanations lacking and concluded that home confinement followed by supervised release, along with financial restitution, was an appropriate sentence for her crimes.
In conclusion, Alexandra Smyth, a Florida businesswoman, was sentenced to six months of home confinement and 36 months of supervised release for defrauding her clients after hurricanes Irma and Maria. Smyth’s actions resulted in the loss of over $41,000 for five fraud victims. Despite Smyth’s attempts to make restitution and apologize, the judge found her motives lacking and ordered her to pay the remaining restitution in monthly installments. The sentence also included the requirement for Smyth to pay for electronic monitors and comply with home confinement regulations to ensure she fulfills her punishment.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
25 Comments
Shouldnt we focus on educating instead of just fining for balance violations?
Education is important, but fines can be a necessary deterrent for those who repeatedly violate rules. Sometimes people need a financial incentive to take things seriously. A combination of both education and consequences can lead to a more balanced approach.
Shouldnt we focus on educating instead of fining for balance violations?
Should fines be harsher for repeat offenders? What do you guys think?
Absolutely, repeat offenders need to face harsher fines to deter them from breaking the law again. Its time to hold people accountable for their actions and send a strong message that repeat offenses will not be tolerated. Enough leniency, its time for consequences.
Is this really about balance or just another way to control us?
Are these fines necessary or just another way to control us?
Can fines really ensure perfect balance or just create more imbalance? 🤔
Should fines be the go-to solution for environmental violations? Lets discuss!
This ruling seems harsh. Shouldnt there be more leniency for small businesses?
This ruling seems harsh. Shouldnt there be more emphasis on education over fines?
Should fines be higher to deter future violations? Discuss.
Is it fair to fine for violating regulations on perfect balance? Lets discuss!
Why is the government so obsessed with regulating every little thing? 🤷♂️
I dont think fines are effective in enforcing balance regulations. Thoughts?
Is it fair to fine for small violations? Lets discuss! 🤔👀
Absolutely, fines for small violations ensure accountability and deter further infractions. Without consequences, there would be chaos. Lets prioritize respecting rules and regulations to maintain order in society. Compliance starts with accepting the consequences of our actions, no matter how minor.
I think fines for violating balance regulations are fair. Nature needs protection! 🌿
I think fines are too harsh. Shouldnt we focus on education first?
Is it fair for fines to be imposed for violating balance regulations? #thoughtprovoking
Absolutely, fines for violating balance regulations are completely fair. Rules are in place for a reason and must be followed to maintain order and fairness. Those who choose to ignore them should face consequences. Its about accountability and respect for the rules.
This judge is taking it too far with those fines, dont you think?
Absolutely not. Those fines are necessary to ensure that people are held accountable for their actions. If anything, the judge should be even stricter to prevent further misconduct. Its about time consequences are taken seriously.
Wow, fines for balance violations? Should we all be walking on eggshells now?
Better follow the rules or pay the price. Its simple – dont violate the balance and you wont get fined. Walking on eggshells? More like just being responsible. Its not that hard.