Adam Swellings, the ringleader of a gang of thugs who beat Garry Newlove to death in 2007, is nearing the end of his minimum sentence of 17 years for the murder. Swellings, who was 19 at the time of the attack, had been freed on bail just hours earlier over a similar assault and had ignored a court order banning him from Warrington, where the killing took place. Despite being cleared for a move to open prison conditions two years ago, the decision was blocked by the then-Justice Secretary Dominic Raab. Garry’s widow, Baroness Helen Newlove, is expected to read an impact statement at Swellings’ upcoming parole hearing. She has expressed feeling helpless during parole hearings and supports the Mirror’s campaign for a victims’ rights bill, which would give victims the right to be updated and consulted on their cases.
The Victims’ Law that the Baroness supports would give victims a voice in the criminal justice system and put them at the center of it. Swellings’ fellow killers, Jordan Cunliffe and Stephen Sorton, who were 16 and 17 at the time of the attack, received minimum jail terms of 12 and 15 years respectively in the 2008 trial. Two other suspects were cleared of involvement. Sorton’s sentence was reduced by two years on appeal, and both he and Cunliffe were released in 2020. Despite the Parole Board review panel rejecting then-Justice Secretary Robert Buckland’s attempt to keep Cunliffe in jail, he was released. The victims’ rights bill would aim to address issues like this and give victims more agency in the criminal justice system.
Baroness Helen Newlove expressed the importance of the victims’ law, stating that only by giving victims a voice will they truly be at the centre of the criminal justice system. The bill would ensure victims are updated and consulted on their cases, providing them with more information and support throughout the legal process. The implementation of a victims’ code last year was seen as a step towards this legislation, but the formal bill has yet to be announced. The impact of violent crimes like the murder of Garry Newlove can have lasting effects on the victims and their families, making it crucial to give them a platform to share their experiences and perspectives.
Adam Swellings’ upcoming parole hearing raises concerns for the Newlove family and emphasizes the need for better support and rights for victims of violent crimes. Garry Newlove was attacked and killed in 2007 after confronting a group of drunk youths vandalizing cars, an incident that forever changed the lives of his loved ones. The pending release of Swellings, the last convicted murderer still in prison over the killing, underscores the importance of victims’ voices and the need for legislation like the victims’ bill. Baroness Helen Newlove’s involvement in the case and support for victims’ rights initiatives highlight the ongoing impact of violent crimes on families and communities, emphasizing the need for reforms that prioritize victim support and empowerment. As Swellings’ minimum sentence comes to an end, attention is drawn to the wider implications for victims of violent crimes and the importance of ensuring their rights and well-being are prioritized in the legal system.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
21 Comments
I think they should serve their full sentence. No excuses for their actions.
I think they should rot in jail for what they did. No sympathy.
Youre entitled to your opinion, but everyone deserves a fair trial and due process. Jumping to conclusions without all the facts doesnt serve justice. Lets wait for the legal system to do its job before passing judgment.
Maybe they deserve a second chance, but they should serve their time first.
Sorry, but serving time is the consequence for their actions. A second chance shouldnt come before facing the music. Lets not forget about the victims who deserve justice. Rehabilitation can come after accountability.
I cant believe theyre even considering letting that person off the hook.
I think the leader deserves a second chance, everyone makes mistakes.
Not all mistakes are equal. Some have consequences that cannot be overlooked. Holding leaders accountable is crucial for maintaining trust and integrity. Giving a second chance may not always be the best solution. Leaders should be held to a higher standard.
I believe they should face the consequences for their actions, no excuses.
This is just outrageous! They should serve their full sentence for justice.
I completely disagree. People deserve a chance for redemption and rehabilitation. Serving a full sentence doesnt always equate to justice. Lets consider the possibility of growth and change instead of condemning someone indefinitely.
I cant believe theyre even considering letting that leader go free. Outrageous!
I know, right? Its a total travesty. The justice system is failing us all. Those in power always seem to get away with anything. Its sickening. Something needs to change, and fast.
Do these teens deserve a second chance or is justice being overlooked?
I cant believe theyre even considering letting him out. Justice for Garry Newlove!
I completely disagree. People deserve a chance at redemption, even if theyve made mistakes. Lets not forget that our justice system is about rehabilitation as much as punishment. Garry Newloves family deserves closure, but locking someone up forever isnt always the answer.
Do these teens truly deserve a second chance after such a tragic event?
Shouldnt there be stricter consequences for leaders of crimes like this?
Do these teenagers deserve a second chance or should they pay for their crime?
Is early release fair for such a heinous crime? Justice or leniency?
Should the leader be held responsible for the actions of intoxicated teenagers?