July 4, 2024
Subscribe
The Real Crime Diary Blog Legal and Courtroom Making Sense of the Verdict (Depp v. Heard)
Legal and Courtroom

Making Sense of the Verdict (Depp v. Heard)

  • by
  • June 16, 2024
  • 23 Comments
  • 1 minute read
  • 15 Views
  • 3 weeks ago



⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! ⚖️
The verdict is in! ☕️ Sign up for Morning Brew now!

Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula!
👔 Suits by Indochino!

GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: [email protected]

MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school!
Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you!

SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter:
Facebook:
Tik Tok:
Instagram:
Reddit:
Podcast:
OnlyFans
Patreon

BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email my agent & manager at [email protected]

LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

Special thanks:
Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images and AP Archives
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Short links by pixelme.me (
Maps provided by MapTiler/Geolayers

source

Tags:

Share This Post:

23 Comments

  • Reply
    @LegalEagle June 16, 2024

    Oh god, my editor misspelled “punitives” and I missed it. Crap. Lol.
    ☕ Seriously, sign up for Morning Brew now (it's the best)! https://legaleagle.link/morningbrew

  • Reply
    @sarz1837 June 16, 2024

    I’m surprised that while Camile did a great job for Depp , she is doing such a terrible job in the Gloria Trevi case, currently happening inPasadena. This is a very big case very big case in Mexico and other Spanish-speaking countries. Her performance so far has been embarrassing. I wish the case would be covered by mainstream American media, because it involves abuse of minors, traff@cking and many other things that would make someone such as Weinst@in or Epst@in seem wholesome and huggable , and yet Camille is blaming the victims.
    It’s a totally different storyline and I think it might be worth your while to look into it.

  • Reply
    @tinkerbell2882 June 16, 2024

    Thanks for making it easy to understand 😊

  • Reply
    @cameronross9376 June 16, 2024

    Why did they go to court in VA??

  • Reply
    @seattlegrrlie June 16, 2024

    So many people took sides and the truth probably is that they are BOTH violent, drunken liars who said nasty things.

  • Reply
    @starmellie June 16, 2024

    Over a year later, we have now seen the mountain of evidence which includes a photocopy from a book claiming to be her injuries and very revealing and mostly damming against her psychologist notes. And she hasn’t fulfilled her pledges.

  • Reply
    @xboy6373 June 16, 2024

    Amber did bot win anything.

  • Reply
    @jzpat June 16, 2024

    You can’t truly believe that they both won right?.. This was a massive overall win for Johnny depp

  • Reply
    @cmeblu75 June 16, 2024

    They didn’t both win. This was a sweeping victory for Depp, she was tossed a chewed up bone!

  • Reply
    @FinnaBusanut June 16, 2024

    Nothing to make sense of.

  • Reply
    @mangos2888 June 16, 2024

    It actually sounded like Mr Waldon's statements were accurate after hearing the whole case

  • Reply
    @karlhendrikse June 16, 2024

    Anytime is an adverb; it's not an abbreviation of any time. You can say "You can sue anybody anytime", or "You can sue anybody at any time", but you can't say "You can sue anybody at anytime".

  • Reply
    @abook2141 June 16, 2024

    i hate depp

  • Reply
    @christiannusser9976 June 16, 2024

    Lock Them Both Up! 😛

  • Reply
    @enderkatze6129 June 16, 2024

    Still don't understand how anyone supported Heard in this

  • Reply
    @daviddavidsonn3578 June 16, 2024

    what I find unbelievable is that there are people who read the Washington compost in 2023…🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • Reply
    @therealdutchidiot June 16, 2024

    I believe the count on Heard's case that was awarder to her was down to the simple fact there's no real way to confirm or deny the claims being made, since there was no evidence for it being true.
    Now, in my country civil cases in terms of he said she said are decided on "who speaks first is correct, the opposing side has to rebut it".

  • Reply
    @liampezzano June 16, 2024

    "Our relationship was intensely passionate and at times volatile, but always bound by love. Neither party has made false accusations for financial gain. There was never any intent of physical or emotional harm,"

    This was the joint statement made when they divorced. During the divorce Heard made claims of physical and emotional abuse. This statement, made by both parties, says that there were no false allegations made and only that no one "intended" to harm anyone.

    Everything Amber Heard said was true. Johnny admitted it when they divorced, and now he's sour about it.

  • Reply
    @StormSought June 16, 2024

    He has so much more money and power, and people already hated her and loved him. Bi women are wildly more likely to experience domestic abuse. People were being so misogynistic in their criticism of her, it really just seemed like they would have used any excuse. No one came out so hard for Terry Crews. They just wanted a woman to rip apart. Libel laws are more strict in the UK, and even that court said she was allowed to call him a wife beater in print because he had in fact beaten her. America really hates women.

  • Reply
    @kingace6186 June 16, 2024

    Great for Johnny!
    But I hate how the current Legal System doesn't have any (checked) authority to hold journalists and media houses for what they publish. I understand the implications and possible abuses, but a well-crafted and well-checked law needs to be implemented. And I am not just talking about the Heard Opinion Piece that the WP published. Every single story published must be held to journalistic standards. Because without a law like this, agencies like Fox News can lie, stoke civil unrest, and even help a despot try to destroy America's democracy.
    The public deserves an enforceable and protect Enacted Right Not to be Disinformed. (Misinformation can happen sometimes but disinformation is knowingly spinning lies and propaganda.)

  • Reply
    @MaricaAmbrosius June 16, 2024

    Now I want your take on Camille Vasquez and their whole strategy.

  • Reply
    @monkeycat48 June 16, 2024

    Not going to lie but I never even saw this I wish I had seen this from the beginning. Still worth looking into thank you legal eagle

  • Reply
    @williamp5858 June 16, 2024

    At the end of the case, the money is the only thing that matters. Depp and Heard both benefited from it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

X
Enable Notifications OK No thanks
Verified by MonsterInsights