Vivian Ross, a 46-year-old shoemaker from Rose Hall, Corentyne, Berbice, was sentenced to four years in prison for killing his friend, Wayne Sundarsingh, while they were drinking. Ross pleaded guilty to manslaughter as part of a plea bargain, acknowledging that he unlawfully killed Sundarsingh on July 13, 2018. He apologized to the deceased’s family during his sentencing hearing, attributing his actions to drinking too much rum. Justice Jo Ann Barlow of the Berbice High Court sentenced Ross to four years in prison and recommended counseling programs for violent offenders for him.
Upon his release from prison, the judge advised Ross to reduce his alcohol consumption. Senior Counsel Murseline Bacchus represented Ross, while State Counsel Muntaz Ali presented the case for the prosecution. Sundarsingh, a painter, was allegedly drinking with friends at Ross’s home when he was struck in the head by Ross. Hours later, Sundarsingh’s family was notified that he was unconscious and instructed to collect him. Upon arrival, they found him barely breathing, bleeding from his ears and head. He was rushed to the hospital but died from haemorrhaging caused by blunt trauma to the head.
Ross initially claimed to police that he had hit Sundarsingh, causing him to fall and hit his head on the ground. The incident resulted in Sundarsingh’s tragic death. Justice Barlow expressed belief in Ross’s sincere apologies to the deceased’s family during the sentencing remarks. She also emphasized the importance of enrolling Ross in counseling programs for violent offenders as part of his rehabilitation. The judge’s decision to sentence Ross to four years in prison took into account the time he had already spent in remand.
The tragic incident involving Ross and Sundarsingh occurred during a drinking session at Ross’s home, where violence erupted leading to the fatal injury. Sundarsingh’s family was devastated by his sudden death and the circumstances surrounding it. Ross’s decision to take responsibility for his actions and plead guilty to manslaughter instead of murder played a significant role in the court’s sentencing decision. The judge’s recommendation for counseling programs post-release highlights the importance of rehabilitation and addressing the root causes of violent behavior.
Overall, Vivian Ross’s sentencing to four years in prison for the manslaughter of Wayne Sundarsingh serves as a reminder of the consequences of alcohol-fueled violence. The judge’s emphasis on counseling for Ross as part of his rehabilitation process underscores the need for addressing underlying issues to prevent future harm. Ross’s remorse and apology to the deceased’s family demonstrate the impact of his actions and the importance of seeking accountability. The tragic outcome of this case highlights the dangers of excessive alcohol consumption and the need for intervention to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
19 Comments
I think the sentence is too harsh, they were friends after all.
I cant believe they gave him only four years, justice is messed up.
Wow, I think the sentence is too harsh. Shouldve been more lenient.
Sorry, but I disagree. Rules are rules, and leniency can lead to chaos. Its important to maintain standards and hold people accountable. Sometimes a firm approach is necessary to ensure fairness and order.
I think the punishment was too harsh. They were friends, mistakes happen.
I think the sentence was too harsh, he didnt deserve 4 years.
Sorry, but consequences for actions dont always align with what we think someone deserves. If he broke the law and was sentenced to 4 years, then thats the reality. Justice isnt always about what feels fair, its about upholding the law.
Wow, seems harsh for a friends mistake. Shouldnt intent matter more?
Who cares? He deserved more time for taking a life. Justice served.
Do you think the punishment was too harsh? Maybe they were just playing around.
Doesnt four years seem too lenient for taking a life? Justice served? 🤔
What if the justice system focused more on rehabilitation than punishment?
Do you think the sentence was fair or too lenient for manslaughter?
Wow, do you think four years is enough for taking someones life?
Wow, do you think the sentence was fair or too harsh? Crazy situation.
Is four years enough for taking a life? Justice or leniency? 🤔
I think the sentence was too harsh considering the circumstances. What do you all think?
I disagree. Sometimes a harsh sentence is necessary to drive home the seriousness of the situation. Its important to uphold consequences for actions. People need to learn accountability. Softening the blow wont always lead to positive outcomes.
Shouldnt the sentence be longer for taking a life? Justice system is flawed.