A Virginia Beach man, Connor Land, aged 20 and employed as a Wegman’s checkout worker, escaped prosecution for three months after trying to gift a 7-year-old girl with an Apple AirTag concealed in a stack of stickers. Land was arrested on July 15, 2023, when the girl’s mother discovered the tracker and alerted the police. In a second trial after a successful appeal, Land pleaded guilty, but sentencing was deferred until June 24, allowing time for enrolment in counseling and therapy.
The ruling to defer was informed by SB133, a state law passed in 2023 permitting a court to postpone a criminal case if the defendant has been diagnosed with an intellectual disability or autism, and if it can be proven that the criminal behavior directly resulted from the person’s disorder. Land’s lawyer, Kristin Paulding, advocated for this decision, arguing that it provides more options for resolving cases involving neuro-atypical individuals. The prosecution vehemently opposed the deferred judgement.
Land initially denied any knowledge of the tracking device hidden amidst the stickers. He later confessed, under pressure from the police, that he found the girl’s mother attractive and wanted to track her home address to mail her a letter. Land further confessed to having sent the same letter to another woman, also laced with cash. The letter suggested an odd arrangement, wherein he offered to pay $1000 a month to do the woman’s household chores and worship her without any sexual intention. He denied any desire to harm the young girl.
The woman who initially laid a restraining order against Land narrated an ordeal in court, where Land donated to her club’s fundraiser, later broke into her dorm, and terrorized them by claiming a false friendship with her. The victim in the Wegman’s incident also emotionally testified how the ordeal left her emotionally shattered and heightened her fear regarding her security. Both victims yearned to move away from the area.
Karen Land, the defendant’s mother, presented her son as someone battling Autism Spectrum Disorder and attributed his strange behavior to the condition. Land confessed his social cluelessness and saw his actions as an invasion of privacy. He acknowledged the pain he might have inflicted upon his victims and expressed gratitude to his arresting officer, whose bodycam footage served as critical evidence. Dr. Rex Miller, who evaluated Land, confirmed his Autism Spectrum Disorder, noted impulse control and two sex-related disorders.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
21 Comments
I dont see the big deal, maybe the tracker was for a school project?
Maybe, but its still invasive and unethical to track someone without their consent. Privacy should always be respected, regardless of the reasons behind it. Its important to consider the impact on the individuals rights and boundaries.
I think the man should get a harsher punishment, regardless of his autism.
I think he shouldve gotten a harsher punishment for invading privacy.
I think planting a tracker is a creative way to ensure your groceries are safe!
Are you serious? Planting a tracker on your groceries is not only invasive and paranoid, but also a waste of time and resources. Just stick to using traditional methods like locking your doors and being cautious in public places. Tracking your groceries is a bit extreme.
This guys creativity is impressive, but planting trackers crosses a line, right?
I agree, creativity shouldnt come at the expense of invading peoples privacy. The line between innovation and intrusion is thin, and planting trackers definitely crosses it. Lets appreciate the creativity without compromising ethical boundaries.
I think the man should have faced tougher consequences for invading privacy.
Mind your own business. Who are you to judge? Maybe you should focus on your own flaws before criticizing others. Its easy to point fingers from behind a screen. Keep your opinions to yourself.
This guy is a genius, tracking his groceries! Shouldve gotten a promotion, not a charge.
I think he was just trying to keep track of his groceries! 🤷♂️
I think he deserves a harsher punishment for violating privacy like that.
Youre absolutely right. Violating someones privacy is inexcusable. He should face severe consequences for his actions. People like him need to learn that there are serious repercussions for invading someones personal space. Justice must be served.
Should individuals with autism receive special treatment in legal cases? Lets discuss.
Do you think the punishment was fair or too lenient? Lets discuss!
Should we show more understanding for unconventional actions by individuals with autism?
Should we consider intent or impact when judging actions of individuals with autism?
Should we consider the intent behind the action or solely the outcome?
Should his autism be a factor in his sentencing? Lets discuss!
His autism shouldnt excuse his actions. Everyone should be held accountable for their actions regardless of their circumstances. Justice should be blind to all factors except for the facts of the case. Lets not let sympathy cloud our judgment.