July 7, 2024
Subscribe
The Real Crime Diary Blog Legal and Courtroom ‘Most unjust thing imaginable’: US southern border crisis examined
Legal and Courtroom

‘Most unjust thing imaginable’: US southern border crisis examined



Newsweek’s Senior Editor-at-Large Josh Hammer discusses the “appalling” situation surrounding illegal immigration at the United States southern border.

The US President had been facing mounting political pressure over the migrant crisis in America.

“Anyone who cares about human rights, justice – all the concepts that these far-left progressives claim to care about – if you care about that, you have to support a secure border,” Mr Hammer told Sky News host Rita Panahi.

“The United States southern border being the way that it is right now is the most inhumane, the most unjust thing imaginable.”

Warning: This story may be distressing to some viewers.

source

Tags:

Share This Post:

25 Comments

  • Reply
    @Tiredofitall-oy7cl June 30, 2024

    I can't, I just can't anymore. Just speechless.

  • Reply
    @lindayeager3126 June 30, 2024

    It will take 20 yrs or more to get rid of Bad ,illegals !

  • Reply
    @lindayeager3126 June 30, 2024

    Thousands of rotten criminals are here ! 😮 Illegals are here that shouldn't be here ,very Dangerous

  • Reply
    @houseofdiamonti June 30, 2024

    As they described what happened to those young girls, my heart shattered thinking about her last few hours. How many of our beautiful women and innocent children must endure such a tragic end before the border is closed?

  • Reply
    @dianebrady6784 June 30, 2024

    Their inability to recognize and admit that ILLEGAL means ILLEGAL is part of the problem.

  • Reply
    @normanattanno4645 June 30, 2024

    MSNBC is woke news media built for the very weak suffering from the Kruger Dunning effect at 100% please disregard MSNBC for your personal mental health.

  • Reply
    @normanattanno4645 June 30, 2024

    TRUMP 2024, is not hate speech.

  • Reply
    @elisabethbruyere400 June 30, 2024

    Get rid if the trash! Poor little girl. My heart goes out to the family and friends who have to experience such a horrific crime. My deepest sympathy 🙏 🌹

  • Reply
    @user-he5so4gz4r June 30, 2024

    My daughter had this 3 years ago, at 19, smallish, looked 14, she was approached by an African in Exeter,Devon,UK.
    Kept following her about asking if she'd like to go back to his flat, drugs,sex and cash was offered, definitely a doctor,engineer or industrial expert, as those progressive liberal globalists tell us who enrich our society. Animal is a better description

  • Reply
    @richardharris4162 June 30, 2024

    for Texas, a strong case, but these are illegals and they get special treatment, not a sure thing for a full conviction and sever sentence, with a unanimous jury decision for max sentence….possible that they will get less than or different than full guilty verdict, a lot can happen in the courtroom. They may not be mentally fit for trial. This is Bizzaro World.
    Jury selection will be tricky, cause defense attorneys will load the jury with immigrants and people from south America or Mexico.

  • Reply
    @theresekirkpatrick3337 June 30, 2024

    We’re so screwed sold out and our freedoms and liberty is next to be destroyed by demon scatt liberals. The
    Brainwashing is complete

  • Reply
    @Yes-Yes1 June 30, 2024

    This guy sounds like Ben Shapiro don’t like it

  • Reply
    @ironch3fq498 June 30, 2024

    They should get that anyway

  • Reply
    @user-cz5uw3fb6f June 30, 2024

    Rita Panahi is one of the best and most credible news anchors out there. Trump 2024 ❤.

  • Reply
    @bmacd2112 June 30, 2024

    That poor girl was naked from the waist down! How can anyone question if a sexual assault occurred?

  • Reply
    @dirtywhiteboy5332 June 30, 2024

    Can't say what I want. Sorry for the family loss.😢😢

  • Reply
    @suecouture9237 June 30, 2024

    not illegal immigrants they are invaders of our country. don’t be so naive and ignorant

  • Reply
    @Bidensucks097 June 30, 2024

    We are forced to pay for other countries borders, but not our own? The simp government needs to be reminded who they work for

  • Reply
    @brandonfurlan1845 June 30, 2024

    The same thing is happening here in Australia, 100.000 immigrants a month but you never here about it from the msm !

  • Reply
    @peterlederer3896 June 30, 2024

    DEMOCRAT DOUBLE STANDARDS

    Its time to hold the Democrats to their
    own standard instead of exemptions and with Hillary Clinton boastfully mocking Trump over the hush money trial people forget that the Democrats really have double standards when it comes to this matter.

    Or that Democrats are guilty of the same when taxpayer funding has been used
    to pay off Bill' Clintons alleged victims of sexual Harrassment and assault in order to influence voters keeping him in office on more than one occassion and incorrectly put down as Government expenditure

    With episodes including Paula Jones who after their completely trashing her name trying to make her out to be a joke and to silence and make her go away

    Was then paid $ 850,000:00 to settle
    then there was the Monica Lewinski episode again Bill was guilty and both were written up as Government Legal expenditure now isn't that the pot calling the kettle black.

    However for this same issue more than one Democrat are now guilty of using taxpayer funding with over 268 Democrat sexual harassment claims occurring at this time all being paid all using taxpayer funding put through as Government expenditure purely to stay in office.

    DEMOCRATS THEMSELVES GUILTY
    OF WHAT THEY ACCUSE TRUMP

    Although the Democrats through Hillary Clinton did attempt to influence an election with the Steel Dosier falsifying business records and breached campaign finance law which is an offence.

    For in 2022 the Federal Election Commission determined that in 2016
    Hillary Clinton in trying to influence the election outcome had committed campaign finance violations by incorrectly detailing campaign violation expenses as Government Legal expenses.

    When they clearly were not Government legal expenses and despite the fact they were guilty they were never prosecuted by any New York district attorneys even though the Clintons campaign was headquartered in New York

    There was never a single prosecution of any Democrat in the Hillary campaign for falsifying business records to cover up a campaign finance violation and yet they go after Trump

    So is it taught to all Democrats that whenever a Democrat is called before Congress to answer questions.

    That they won't answer but will deflect, pontificate on something entirely different and say they'll get back on that but never do all without ever answering the question.

    THE EVIDENCE FOR SELECTIVE
    POLITICAL PROSECUTION

    Prosecution based on political motivation

    Why when Democrats are guilty of doing exactly what they accuse Trump of doing are they exempt but are they now going after Trump in an election year.

    DEMOCRAT CAMPAIGN VIOLATIONS VIOLATING CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW

    When in 2022 the Federal Election Commission determined that Hillary Clinton committed campaign finance violations occurring in 2016 by trying to influence the election outcome which occurred in the same year they are now pursuing Trump for

    However why when the Clinton campaign paid taxpayer monies to fund the steel dossier portfolio with supposedly incriminating allegations against Trump and incorrectly reporting them as Government Legal expenses.

    Whereby the F.E.C. in 2022 after reviewing conveyed they were not Government legal expenses they were campaign violation expenses and that by falsifying business records violates campaign finance law.

    It was the Democrats who violated campaign finance law and despite the
    fact they were guilty they were never prosecuted by any New York district attorneys despite the Clintons campaign being headquartered in New York

    There was never a single prosecution of any Democrat in the Hillary campaign for falsifying business records to cover up a campaign finance violation now isn't that what they are accusing Trump of doing
    so why isn't Hillary being pursued and Jailed

    But the corruption runs deep and we
    could also talk about Hillary Clinton and the russiagate fiasco and Hillary Clinton funding of Fusion GPS for fake information.

    Where Clintons paid for a fake dossier of information that Trump had colluded with Russia when it was all a set up.

    With all the lies and cover ups and the deleted emails occurring before congress again using taxpayer funding that influenced the outcome of an election.

    Then there was the Benghazi episode and causing the deaths of American diplomats and then there's the Epstein involvement.

    Total Democrat hypocrisy after the Trump guilty verdict with Hillary Clinton having the audacity now in posts and through merchandise with her image and a caption saying she was right about Trump all along shows their utter depravity and Gall so why isn't she in jail.

  • Reply
    @peterlederer3896 June 30, 2024

    TRUMP DID NOT VIOLATE THE LAW

    So when the election was in 2016 and
    no Trump payments were made until long after the election with the first occurring in 2017 and he was already President.
    So how can it be classified as election interference, manipulation and fraud attempting to influence an election.

    When there was no fraud, the statements were undervalued with no evidence of concealment. In fact there was eighteen pages of additional disclosing asset information and the Banks made it clear they provided Deutsch Bank above and beyond with everything they needed.

    So there was no crime and this is a political trial to remove an apponent in an election year and do all to hinder his election chances.

    Truthfully it's time to go after the Democrats for all their offences including Hillary Clinton violating campaign finance law

    Why are Democrats exempt when the Clinton campaign paid taxpayer monies to fund the steel dossier portfolio with supposedly incriminating allegations against Trump and incorrectly reporting them as Government Legal expenses.

    Whereby the F.E.C. in 2022 after reviewing conveyed they were not Government legal expenses they were campaign violation expenses and that by falsifying business records violates campaign finance law.

    It was the Democrats who violated campaign finance law not Trump and despite the fact they were guilty they were never prosecuted by any New York district attorneys despite the Clintons campaign being headquartered in New York so is there a double standard.

    Then there were Democrats causing numerous American deaths in Afghanistan and for the Democrat lies costing lives over the non existent weapons of mass destruction

    Just as its time to go after Democrat Obama for the Drone deaths of Americans and Obama care and for his empowering Mexican drug Cartels with american weapons that in turn caused the death of a U.S Border guard.

    Its time to go after Democrat Bush for imprisoning and torturing Americans at Gitmo and its time to go after Democrat Nancy Pelosi for all the illegal insider trading.

    And its time to Go after corrupt Joe Biden and the Biden crime family and all their illegal dealings and there are so many of them its beyond the pale. The Hunter gun trial is only the tip of the iceberg and
    purely a smokescreen negating any association to his father.

  • Reply
    @peterlederer3896 June 30, 2024

    CELEBRATORY NOTES POSTED ONLINE BEFORE COURT CONCLUDED

    Concerning the Trump Political lawfare
    Occurring under the Democrats the U.S. justice system has been compromised through the destruction of the legal system and if there was ever grounds for Supreme Court intervention this is it.

    This is crucial as leaks are now coming out of Bragg's department conveying they are seeking to Jail Trump for a minimum of at least twelve months but hopefully longer.

    Possibly in a Super Maximum security prison like Five Points Correctional Facility  and through collaboration from secret service to remove all his security detail where its believed they'll possibly attempt to Epstein him.

    The fact is that Trump will not receive a fair trial in the Blue State of New York where even looking at the Judges on the appeals Court each one is Democrat

    It's now also coming out that there were celebratory notes posted on the Judicial system website that Trump was going to be declared Guilty on all charges the day before the jury made their findings as if it was a foregone conclusion.

    Now for many that alone would be grounds for a mis – trial with jury members disclosing trial information outside of court whilst the court is in motion.

  • Reply
    @peterlederer3896 June 30, 2024

    THE WEAPONISATION
    OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM

    This was a blatant weaponisitation of the legal system against Trump for something that had past the statute of limitations for a non disclosure payment that wasnt against the law.

    But they have manipulated into something more and into a Federal Law matter with all legal excess bounds being broken.

    Even before walking into the Court room this Judge ordered the Trump organisation and all affiliated companies and even his trust to be dissolved.

    This was even before any witnesses had taken the stand so the outcome of this case was evident and set in motion before it even began.

    Throughout the prosecution endeavouring through slight of hand in bringing into the trial matters that had nothing to do with this trial and turn it into a Federal offence and something entirely different to what it is and then have it tried it in a State jurisdiction

    And while a State Court can't try on
    Federal jurisdiction matters however it has in this instance and this sets a dangerous precedent for the American system of law

    It was a State Court trying on a
    Federal matter by a hand picked leftist Democrat Judge from Colombia and no one knows who appointed him as a Judge who is funding the Democrat Party and whose daughter was making money from the Trump Trial and stood to make much more if Trump was found guilty.

    There was a Democrat Soros funded Prosecutor and a Democrat Jury all hand picked after detailing they each hated Trump and hadn't voted for him and by demonstating their hate for Trump made them suitable as Jurists to this Judge.

    Where is we are all equal before the law and justice is blind and everyone is entitled to a fair trial but not Trump it would appear and this was stacked from the get-go.

    In all honesty how does anyone defend against something when they are not informed of what the charge is.

    While no one knew what the offence was going to be until after closing arguments and the Jury didnt need to unanimously agree on which offence as they could pick one from a drop down box.

    So even if different jurors picked different offences the Judge allowed that as a unanimous jury decision and even though there were no victims and the Bank has no complaints as Trump repaid the debt with his own money

    There were expert Election law
    witnesses for Trump not allowed with Bragg knowingly allowing perjury and false testimony against Trump on the witness stand and breaches of Trumps constitutional rights while repeatedly violating the Brady Supreme Court Ruling by withholding crucial evidence.

    This trial was set in motion the day
    Trump declared he was running and Biden declared intent of using the legal system against him. If this isn't a weaponisation of the legal system purely designed to get Trump in an election year and remove a Political apponent

    Trumps counsel repeatedly sought a directed verdict stating there is no case and that the Prosecutions star witness Michael Cohen really can't be trusted to give an honest account of anything.
    Especially when he has already been found to be a serial perjurist whose testimony is unreliable and changes to suit.

    So you have a corrupt Soros backed trial with a Judge restricting Trump unable to defend himself having had a gag order placed and a scenario where his attorney's are also gagged and not allowed to say what they need in order to defend their client.

    This all goes against the constitution and is needing to go to the Supreme Court and there are numerous grounds for taking it there.

    We could ask has the Supreme Court ever intervened in an election when it violated the constitution.

    Yes in the Bush vs Gore case and although the decision was split but seven did vote in favor on the application of the equal protection clause

    This is a close precedent case to what's occurring with Trump whereby in a similiar situation with a State Prosecutor and State Court seizing Federal jurisdiction authority in a Federal campaign.

    But in Trumps case its not just any Federal campaign its the most important Federal campaign being for the President of the United States and thats number one

    Number two is you have a myriad of fifth and fourteenth amendment violations against the current Republican nominee and former President.

    Violations not only hindering the Republican party as a whole and their donors but also the candidate himself and also hindering the American people

    As an equal participant in a Presidential election whereby because of this the Repubican campaign is handicapped.

    As the Democrat campaign can do so unfetted and the Republican campaign is shackled and they are shackled for over a six week period and the State jurisdiction Judge is not done depending upon what the Appellant Courts do in New York

    So there are numerous grounds in this Trump case where you have a violation of due process under the fifth and fourteenth amendments

    For this case not only violates the first amendment, the fifth amendment due process and equal protection rights but also those conveyed in the fourteenth amendment and the sixth amendment.

    Whereby you have a right to competent council however a legal council can't be competent when constantly being interrupted sabotaged and hamstrung throughout the trial then gagged so they cannot defend their client.

    Unable to call proper witnesses and not given notice of what laws are involved or of what crime and then withholding crucial evidence with State Democrat Judges then making judicial decisions on Federal law issues

    With so many examples what was the point of all these due process violations it was to influence the election outcome and how by getting a guilty verdict

    A writ of certiorari along with an all writs and a common law writs are needing to be brought and filed with the Supreme Court but in doing so detailing where the harm is immediate and ongoing both to the Federal electoral system , the Federal campaign and to jurisdiction issues

    For just as there are writs at common law , including the all writs which are common law writs and part of the all writs act that are part of the judiciary act of 1789.

    Along with Filing a writ of prohibition that restrains a body exercising and exceeding its judicial powers by usurping its jurisdiction as this State Court has done.

    Also filing an order of Mandamus ordering a lower Court to stay their actions while the Federal Court considers it and whether general supervision over inferior State Courts applies.

    Especially with this State Courts obstructing Federal pre-emption when Federal jurisdiction law violations are being heard by a State jurisdiction law court exceeding its authority with an acting State Judge and a State prosecutior and this an ongoing violation of constitutional rights

    A State Court cannot regulate congress
    as it's doing in this case where it takes authority to declare what a Federal election Law violation is and thats important or the equal protection clause
    or the due process clause or the first amendment right of free speech concerning a non disclosure agreement.

    Then there is the supremacy clause , and the necessary property clause where when it comes to regulating Federal elections the Supreme Court has over -riding authority and there are multiple violations of Federal law occurring in this case

    The Reverse Federalism and the precedent it creates through the back-door if it's left unchecked can't be allowed

    There are numerous grounds for Supreme Court intervention especially when there is already a bad precedent having been set in that the American people are left sitting around waiting for a State to decide the fate of a Presidential candidate on Federal law matters.

    If its not challenged it is going up through a State Court level Court and is binding on a Federal Presidential candidate and all of this State Appellant process involves Federal law.

    The fact its taking place is enough to seek Supreme Court intervention and doing so through the all writs and the common law writs but also tieing the Federalisation of what occurred in Manhattan.

    Where not only the Federal Government
    is being affected but so too is a Federal election and the American people as a whole for the entire campaign law process is now affected by this one State and by this one Court.

    Its not only this but also the State Court issued gag order that not only applies to Trump but apply's to all Americans and their ability to hear their presidential candidate this is a violation of their constitutional rights as well.

    The first amendment right to free speech does not only apply to the speaker it also applies to the listeners and this lawfare denies voters access to hear from their chosen candidate in the heat of an election campaign

    Then it's election interference and under article three section two of the U.S. Constitution the U.S. Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over this case.

    However while in New York you would also file the notice of your right to appeal and ask for a stay of the trial Court so that you stay the sentencing while considering the case.

    While also filing an emergency notice
    of appeal and seeking from the New York Appellant Court an expedited emergency review.

  • Reply
    @peterlederer3896 June 30, 2024

    DEMOCRAT CORRUPTION UNDER BIDEN

    Truthfully its time to go after corrupt Joe Biden and his drug addict son and all their illegal dealings truthfully why should Democrats be exempt.

    Its alright to say Joe Biden is too old and frail to stand trial over anything he's done. But then to say he's never been more cognitive and on top of his game and alright to be President and leader of the free world really you can't have it both ways.

    ELECTION FRAUD AND COLLUSION

    And it's now come out the Biden family along with 51 intel secret service agents colluded with big tech to lie to the American people spreading propaganda and misinformation in order to interfere and influence the outcome of the 2020 election

    So the Democrats are actually guilty
    of election fraud manipulating the outcome of an election on more than one occassion and not Trump as through deception they stole the 2020 election.

    And it was telling watching Joe Biden's televised response after the Trump trial verdict was a long and hard evil smirking smile at the camera.

    These people are truly evil and Biden knows exactly what he's doing and its not adhering his oath that he took when sworn into office pledging allegiance to America its laws and to uphold the constitution when both he and the Democrat party are openly committing acts of treason against America

  • Reply
    @peterlederer3896 June 30, 2024

    THE BIDEN CORRUPTION RUNS DEEP

    Honestly the Biden family are so corrupt.

    The Democrat corruption against America , its people and its interests under Biden runs deep. However endeavouring through subpoenaed information to investigate the Biden family you also not only have to investigate their tax evasions.

    But also their money laundering, and the numerous shelf companies they've set up to accomodate it,.

    Along with the racketeering and with his being an unregistered foreign agent selling national security detail to foreign interests.

    You also need to look at their bribery and collusion whereby bank records reveal only some of the extent as the Biden's continue raking in millions of dollars from American adversaries worldwide.

    Including from adversaries in China whereby the documentation reveals contrary to their protestations the fact that Joe Biden himself has communicated with every single person that sent his family money and had dinners with many of them and he is directly involved.

    While everything we thought about the Biden laptop and selling information to foreign nationals and spies is true.

    It's not Russian disinformation and the FBI knew about it and were colluding and manipulating the election outcome in order to get Biden elected while running cover for him.

    Then we have stealing classified Government documents and sitting on them while still only a Senator and he had no right to do so.

    The difference between him and Trump was that Trump was President and had the right to declassify documents but Joe Biden when only a Senator did not.

    However for this gun offence by Hunter Biden was honestly the least offensive misdemeanour that they could muster in the Hunter Biden' long list of one hundred and seventy offences.

    Thats right there are one hundred and seventy Hunter Biden offences that they knew about and are divulged upon his laptop its not Russian propaganda but they've run cover protecting him and his father throughout.

    It this was all occurring even before the election that got Biden elected and they knew about it but ran protection censoring it from coming out

    So when there are much bigger crimes including being a bag man for his father

    The Democrat corruption against America , its people and its interests under Biden runs deep. However endeavouring through subpoenaed information to investigate the Biden family you also not only have to investigate their tax evasions.

    But also their money laundering and the numerous shelf companies they've set up to accomodate it.

    Along with the racketeering and with his being an unregistered foreign agent selling national security detail to foreign interests acting against America and doing so with his father's involvement.

    You also need to look at their bribery and collusion whereby bank records reveal only some of the extent as the Biden's continue raking in millions of dollars from American adversaries worldwide.

    Including from adversaries in China, Russia and numerous other Global players. Whereby the documentation reveals contrary to their protestations, the fact
    that Joe Biden himself has communicated with every single person that sent his family money and had dinners with many of them.

    While everything we thought about the Biden laptop and selling information to foreign nationals and spies is true.

    It's not Russian disinformation and the
    FBI knew about it and Joe Biden himself was involved they were colluding and manipulating the election outcome in order to get Joe Biden elected while running cover for him.

    They knew all this was occurring before the election and still ran cover to get him elected while censoring information so that Americans remained unaware.

    While the Democrats claim no one is above the law, except it would seem Democrat Joe Biden. Who by invoking executive privilege for himself and those running cover for him including those fifty one lying intelligence officials and the Department of Justice and Merrit Garland.

    All so that Joe Biden doesn't face any legal jeopardy so why is no one is above the law suddenly is above the law but only when it concerns a Democrat.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

X
Enable Notifications OK No thanks
Verified by MonsterInsights