Oregon Governor Tina Kotek recently signed House Bill 4002 into law, effectively reversing Measure 110, which had decriminalized possession of small amounts of illicit drugs in 2020. This new law makes it a crime once again to possess personal-use amounts of drugs such as heroin, methamphetamine, fentanyl, and oxycodone. Under Measure 110, offenders were given the option to attend a treatment center or pay a fine instead of facing jail time.
Supporters of Measure 110 argued that offering voluntary treatment would lead to better outcomes and lower relapse rates for drug offenders. They believed that mandatory jail or treatment would not be as effective and could hinder the ability of drug users to kick their habits, find jobs, or secure housing after being released from jail with criminal records. However, opponents felt that the measure allowed addiction to take hold by creating an environment that exacerbated the state’s ongoing drug problems.
The new provision under House Bill 4002 will go into effect in September, giving offenders the choice between being charged or opting for treatment. Offenders will need to complete a behavioral health screening and participate in a “deflection program” to avoid fines. Senate Majority Leader Kate Lieber, who worked on crafting the legislation, believes that Portland will begin to see a difference on the streets in the coming weeks as a result of this new law. However, local advocates have expressed concerns about potential racial disparities with recriminalization and the impact of the law on an already-burdened public defender shortage statewide.
The executive director of the Health Justice Recovery Alliance, Tera Hurst, has criticized House Bill 4002 as a costly step in the wrong direction. She stated that criminalizing addiction does not effectively address the issue, and when it becomes a crime again, individuals struggling with addiction may go back into the shadows, leading to potentially fatal consequences, especially with drugs like fentanyl. Governor Kotek has acknowledged these concerns and stated that her office will work closely with implementing authorities to address issues of racial equity and respond to the concerns raised by advocates about the impact of the law on communities of color.
House Bill 4002 marks a significant shift in drug policy in Oregon, moving away from the decriminalization approach of Measure 110 back towards criminalizing possession of small amounts of illicit drugs. While supporters of the new law believe that it will lead to better outcomes for drug offenders, opponents argue that it could worsen the state’s drug problems. The implementation of the new provision in September will provide offenders with a choice between being charged or undergoing treatment, with the goal of addressing addiction and reducing relapse rates. Concerns have been raised about potential racial disparities and the impact on the criminal justice system in Oregon as a result of this new legislation.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
21 Comments
I think criminalizing drug possession is a step backwards. Addiction needs compassion, not punishment.
This is ridiculous! Criminalizing drug possession wont solve anything. Treatment and education are key.
Hey, I get where youre coming from, but sometimes tough measures are necessary to address serious issues. Without consequences, some people wont seek help. Its a complex issue that requires a multi-faceted approach.
I think this is a step backwards. We should focus on harm reduction, not punishment.
Actually, punishment can be a form of harm reduction by deterring future harmful behavior. Sometimes consequences are necessary to protect society. Its not always about punishment for the sake of punishment, but about preventing harm in the first place.
This is a step backward! Lets focus on rehabilitation, not punishment.
Actually, some crimes demand punishment, not just hand-holding. Rehabilitation is important, but consequences must also be faced for actions. Lets not overlook the need for accountability in the justice system.
This is just going to perpetuate the cycle of incarceration and not address the root issues.
I think its a step backward. Should focus on rehab, not punishment.
Rehabilitation is important, but punishment is also necessary for accountability. Its not a step backward to prioritize consequences for harmful actions. Both aspects are crucial for promoting a safer and more just society.
This decision seems harsh. Shouldnt we focus on rehabilitation instead of punishment?
This move could worsen drug issues instead of addressing root causes.
I think this decision will only increase incarceration rates without addressing root causes.
I believe focusing on rehabilitation rather than punishment would be more effective.
Rehabilitation is a luxury criminals dont deserve. Punishment sends a clear message that actions have consequences. Let them face the music for their crimes instead of coddling them. Societys safety should come first.
Why criminalize possession instead of focusing on rehabilitation and harm reduction?
Criminalizing possession serves as a deterrent and holds individuals accountable for their actions. Rehabilitation and harm reduction are important, but consequences for illegal behavior must also be enforced. Its about striking a balance between prevention and support for those struggling with addiction.
Why punish drug possession instead of focusing on rehabilitation and support?
Why punish addicts instead of providing help and support? Prioritize rehabilitation over punishment.
Addicts need to face consequences for their actions. If we coddle them with only support and no accountability, theyll never learn. Rehabilitation is important, but so is personal responsibility. Its a balance, not a free pass.
I believe this move will lead to more harm than good in the long run.