MP Rushton Paray of Mayaro has decided not to engage in the United National Congress (UNC) internal party elections through the media. He called for the party leadership to respect the voice of its members and move forward with the internal elections due in June. Paray emphasized the importance of holding these elections to ensure the party is prepared to lead the nation and avoid a third successive defeat in the General Elections. He urged his colleagues to take a stand, prompting criticism from party executives, including claims that he is a member of the opposing PNM party.
In response to the criticism, Paray announced that he would no longer engage in the internal party elections through the media and would instead communicate directly with his colleagues. He emphasized the importance of maintaining open lines of communication within the party and welcomed direct dialogue with his fellow Parliamentary members. Paray expressed gratitude for the attention the issue has received from both party members and the nation, reaffirming his advocacy for the internal elections to proceed in accordance with the party’s constitution.
The controversy surrounding Paray’s stance on the internal party elections escalated when Oropouche East MP Dr Roodal Moonilal accused Paray of being a member of the PNM and claimed that the party did not have time for games. This criticism underscored the tensions within the UNC as members navigate the internal election process and strive to maintain party unity. Paray’s decision to refrain from media engagement and focus on direct communication with colleagues indicates a desire to address internal party issues in a more collaborative and constructive manner.
Paray’s call for the UNC leadership to respect the voice of its members and conduct the internal elections in June reflects an underlying concern for the party’s unity and electoral success. By urging his colleagues to stand up for the party’s principles and prioritize internal organization, Paray seeks to position the UNC as a strong and unified force capable of leading the nation effectively. As the party navigates internal challenges and prepares for the upcoming elections, Paray’s decision to focus on direct communication with colleagues may foster greater cohesion and cooperation within the UNC, ultimately strengthening the party’s ability to compete in the political arena.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
25 Comments
I think Paray is just trying to save face. Hes not genuine at all.
I disagree. Paray seems sincere to me. Its easy to misjudge someones intentions, especially online. Lets give him the benefit of the doubt and not jump to conclusions. Everyone deserves a fair chance to show their true colors.
I disagree with Parays stance on direct dialogue – transparency is key!
I think Parays idea of direct dialogue is a game-changer! Whos in for a debate?
Direct dialogue is just a fancy term for confrontation. Count me out of your ego-driven debate. Real progress happens through collaboration, not conflict. Lets focus on finding common ground instead of fueling division.
Did Paray really address the root issues or just skim the surface? 🤔
Parays approach may have scratched the surface, but true change requires digging deeper. Its easy to apply band-aids, but addressing root issues takes courage and commitment. Lets not settle for quick fixes when the foundation needs rebuilding. Keep pushing for real solutions.
Direct dialogue? More like direct disaster! Paray needs a reality check ASAP!
Oh please, dont be so harsh. Parays direct dialogue might be bold, but it definitely gets the job done. Sometimes a reality check is needed to shake things up. Embrace the chaos!
Is Paray really ready for direct dialogue? I smell political maneuvering here.
Paray may be ready for direct dialogue, but lets not ignore the possibility of political games at play. Its crucial to approach this situation with a critical eye and hold all parties accountable for their actions. Trust but verify.
Direct dialogue is overrated! Lets spice it up with some interpretive dance instead.
Direct dialogue may be overrated to some, but interpretive dance doesnt always hit the mark either. Why limit ourselves to one form of expression when we can embrace a variety of communication methods? Lets keep things dynamic and diverse for a truly engaging experience.
I dont buy Parays sudden change of heart. This direct dialogue seems fishy.
Is direct dialogue truly the solution? Lets dig deeper into Parays perspectives.
Isnt it refreshing to see a politician open to direct dialogue? Lets discuss!
Sure, its great to see a politician open to dialogue, but actions speak louder than words. Lets see if this openness actually leads to meaningful change or if its just another political stunt. Time will tell.
I think Parays openness to direct dialogue is refreshing and could lead to progress.
Is Paray really open to direct dialogue or just playing politics? 🤔
I dont think Paray is really ready for direct dialogue. Seems fishy to me.
Im not convinced Paray is truly open to direct dialogue. Actions speak louder!
Interesting take on direct dialogue in party matters. Do you think its feasible?
Feasible? Absolutely. Direct dialogue is vital for transparency and accountability in party matters. Any reluctance to embrace it only raises suspicions of hidden agendas. Lets prioritize open communication over closed-door decisions. Its time for parties to truly listen to their members.
I wonder if Paray is really open to direct dialogue or just politicking.
Paray seems more interested in playing political games than engaging in genuine dialogue. Actions speak louder than words, and Parays track record speaks for itself. Dont be fooled by empty promises or false gestures of openness. Trust your instincts and hold them accountable.