Mick Palmer, a former senior police officer in Australia, is advocating for the regulation of cannabis and believes that it will be freely and legally available within five years. He has joined the board of the Pennington Institute, a prominent supporter of cannabis legalization, and is pushing for Victoria to be a testing ground for this campaign. Research released by the Institute shows that 54% of Victorians want more relaxed drug laws, while only 21% believe the current laws are effective. Palmer argues that the current system is not working, and there is significant public support for new legislation.
Palmer, who has been a police officer for 33 years and is now a barrister, emphasizes the ineffectiveness of the current cannabis laws. He suggests that continuing to arrest cannabis users is not the answer and calls for a better approach. Palmer draws a parallel to the past enforcement of laws against Aboriginal people drinking in the Northern Territory, labeling such laws as ineffective and harmful. He believes that regulating and legalizing cannabis is the way forward and is advocating for this change.
A bill sponsored by the Greens to legalize cannabis is already before the federal parliament, and there is openness from Victoria’s mental health minister for community consultation on the issue. Palmer sees Victoria as a potential location for a trial of regulated cannabis. He stresses that remaining stagnant on this issue is a failure and highlights the need for progress. Palmer envisions a carefully regulated system for cannabis access, with age restrictions in place to prevent access for children under a certain age.
In a podcast interview on Neil Mitchell Asks Why?, Palmer discusses the potential regulations for cannabis access, which may include age restrictions and the need for prescriptive advice for young users. He is joined by Dr. Michael Carr-Gregg, an adolescent psychologist who has voiced concerns about the risks of cannabis use. Palmer acknowledges the need for careful regulation to safeguard against potential harms associated with cannabis. He believes that a new approach to cannabis laws is necessary and that the time for change is overdue.
Palmer’s advocacy for cannabis regulation and legalization marks a significant shift in the ongoing debate around drug laws in Australia. His experience as a senior police officer lends credibility to his arguments for reform, and his involvement with the Pennington Institute signals a growing movement in support of changing cannabis legislation. The release of research showing public support for relaxed drug laws in Victoria further strengthens the case for reform. With increasing momentum behind the push for cannabis regulation, it is likely that the issue will continue to be a topic of conversation and debate in the coming years.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
17 Comments
Do we really need more pot shops on every corner? Think about the kids!
Is cannabis reform really a priority when there are bigger issues at stake?
Is cannabis really a harmless plant or a gateway drug? Lets discuss!
Cannabis may not be harmless for everyone. It can lead some people down a path to more dangerous substances. Lets not ignore the potential risks just for the sake of promoting its benefits. Stay informed and consider all perspectives before forming an opinion.
Is cannabis reform really the top priority right now? Lets discuss!
Yes, cannabis reform is a crucial issue that deserves attention. Its about more than just getting high—its about social justice, economic growth, and health benefits. Lets not overlook the significance of this topic in todays society.
Is cannabis really a harmless plant or a gateway drug? Lets discuss! 🌿🤔
Cannabis can have different effects on individuals. While some may find it harmless, others may experience negative consequences. The debate continues, but its important to consider both sides before forming an opinion. Stay informed and open-minded in the discussion. 🌿💬
Legalizing cannabis is a slippery slope. What about the potential risks and consequences?
Should cannabis legalization focus on medical or recreational use first?
This advocates determination is admirable, but is full legalization really the answer?
Should we focus on legalizing cannabis or address other pressing issues first?
Legalizing cannabis may lead to increased tax revenue, but what about potential health risks?
Is cannabis reform really necessary or just a distraction from bigger issues?
Cannabis reform is absolutely necessary. Its not a distraction but a crucial step towards rectifying the failed war on drugs, promoting social justice, and boosting the economy. Dont downplay its importance – this issue affects millions of lives and should not be dismissed.
Is it time to fully legalize cannabis or should we proceed with caution? 🤔
Should we focus on decriminalization instead of full legalization for cannabis reform?