A federal prosecutor in B.C. opposed delaying a sentencing hearing for Amandeep Kang, a member of the Brothers Keepers gang who was recently shot at his family’s home. The prosecutor argued that keeping Kang out on bail poses a significant danger to the public, especially since the shooting took place near rental units in the residence. Another associate of Kang was also targeted in a shooting incident in downtown Vancouver, emphasizing the ongoing gang conflict in the region.
Kang’s lawyer requested a postponement of the sentencing hearing due to his client’s hospitalization for a possible infection resulting from the shooting. However, the prosecutor argued that even a short delay would increase the risk to the public, given Kang’s involvement in drug trafficking and organized crime. The court ultimately decided to adjourn the hearing to April 5, allowing Kang time to recover and attend the proceedings.
The Brothers Keepers gang is part of the ongoing gang conflict in British Columbia and has been targeted by rival groups such as the United Nations gang and the BIBO/Kang group. Kang had previously pleaded guilty to drug trafficking charges related to his involvement in selling fentanyl, heroin, methamphetamines, and cocaine across the province. The charges were the result of a three-year investigation by law enforcement targeting the gang’s activities.
The sentencing hearing for Kang will resume in April, where he is expected to be present. The case highlights the risks and dangers associated with gang activity in the region, as evidenced by the recent shootings targeting Kang and his associates. The ongoing gang conflict in British Columbia has led to violence and instability, posing a significant threat to public safety.
Despite the challenges and dangers posed by gang activity, law enforcement continues to investigate and prosecute individuals involved in organized crime. The unresolved murder of Jaskeert Kalkat, a high-profile member of the Brothers Keepers gang, underscores the complexities and risks associated with these criminal networks. The court’s decision to proceed with Kang’s sentencing hearing underscores the commitment to addressing and combating gang-related crimes in the province.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox.
18 Comments
I think the gangster should be given a chance to turn his life around.
No way! Hes had his chances and chosen his path. He needs to face the consequences of his actions. Letting him off easy sends the wrong message and undermines justice. Its time for accountability, not more leniency.
Maybe the gangster just needs a hug, not jail time. #FreeHugsForGangsters
While hugs are great for spreading love, its important to remember the impact of criminal behavior on communities. Rehabilitation and support are crucial, but accountability for harmful actions is necessary. #SupportRehabilitationAndAccountability
Why is the focus on the gangster? What about the broken justice system?
I think the gangster should be given a chance to turn his life around.
I think the gangster should be given a chance to reform. Rehabilitation over punishment!
I think the gangster should be allowed to stay on bail, free choice!
That gangster deserves a fair trial too, we cant just assume guilt.
Are you serious? A gangster who likely terrorized communities and committed crimes deserves empathy and a fair trial? Lets prioritize justice for the innocent victims and protect society from those who choose a criminal path. Justice is not about coddling criminals, its about accountability.
I think the prosecutor has a point, we cant risk public safety!
I respectfully disagree. Sacrificing individual rights for the illusion of security sets a dangerous precedent. We must strive for a balance between public safety and civil liberties. A knee-jerk reaction to prioritize one over the other can lead to a slippery slope of authoritarianism.
Shouldnt we trust the justice systems decision on bail conditions?
Shouldnt safety of the public come first before considering bail conditions? Just saying.
The safety of the public is paramount, but bail conditions are set to balance individual rights and community safety. Its a delicate balance that the justice system must navigate. Simply saying just saying doesnt address the complexity of the issue at hand.
Shouldnt safety of the public come first? Maybe stricter bail conditions are needed.
I think the prosecutor has a point, we need to prioritize public safety!
I dont buy it, seems exaggerated. Let the legal system do its job.