Warning: this story contains disturbing details.
Family and friends of Treasa Lynn Oberly say they are in disbelief after the man who dismembered her body was spared jail time for the crime.
Earlier this month, Joseph Skelly walked out of the Edmonton Law Courts to begin a conditional sentence for committing an indignity to Oberly’s body.
Skelly, a 69-year-old retired butcher from Beaumont, admitted to cutting Oberly’s body into pieces in his garage, burning it and burying the remains in a shallow grave near Whitecourt.
Advertisement 2
The damage was so severe homicide investigators were unable to determine Oberly’s cause of death and could only identify the remains by DNA.
During Skelly’s sentencing hearing March 7, Court of King’s Bench Justice John Little sided with the defence and agreed to a conditional sentence that will see Skelly serve house arrest followed by a curfew.
He acknowledged Oberly’s loved ones “will not be satisfied with my ruling, and I accept that.”
Little nonetheless assured them they “were heard” and that the Crown prosecutor — who sought a three-and-a-half year prison sentence — “put forth her best argument.”
The Alberta Crown Prosecution Service said it is reviewing Little’s decision. It has one month from the date of sentencing to file an appeal.
Kenneth Skelly, Joseph Skelly’s son and Oberly’s boyfriend, is charged with second-degree murder in her death. A preliminary hearing in the case is set for August.
‘He needs to serve time’
Kay Zimath, Oberly’s mother, watched the sentencing remotely from her home in Delaware.
“It’s horrible. It’s outrageous,” she said. “There are so many people that are in shock here in the States, all her friends and family. And me, I can’t sleep. I couldn’t eat for a week after I heard the verdict.”
Advertisement 3
Zina Hinkley, a friend who attended court, said realizing Skelly was going to avoid jail time felt like “a horror movie.”
Particularly jarring for Hinkley was the attention Little paid to the letters of support Skelly received from friends and family — which described him as a “selfless” volunteer “who was always willing to help others” — as well as Skelly’s recent success in Alcoholics Anonymous.
“Honestly, I don’t care,” Hinkley said. “I don’t care if he got clean and sober, I don’t care if he was Mother Teresa before he did this crime. He did this crime, and he needs to serve time. That’s just how it should be.”
She described Oberly, 40, as a loyal and selfless friend who was a “fierce mama bear” to her little boy.
Samantha, another friend, was taken aback by Little’s conclusion that Skelly acted out of “fatherly instinct.” A parent herself, Samantha (who asked only her first name be used) disagreed that dismembering a body is an understandable reaction to the circumstances.
“Fatherly instinct should be to protect your children, but you still teach your children to do the right thing,” she said.
Advertisement 4
‘Completely misguided’
In Canada, interfering with a body carries no minimum prison term, and conditional sentences are not ruled out under the law.
Crown prosecutor Christina Da Rosa argued a conditional sentence for Skelly would be “extreme.” She highlighted multiple aggravating factors she argued merited a prison sentence, including the degree of damage Skelly caused to Oberly’s body, rendering the remains all but unidentifiable.
Skelly also lied to police and only revealed what he had done after investigators seized his cellphone.
Little, however, was unconvinced. He agreed with defence lawyer Nicole Stewart that Skelly feels real remorse — as evidenced by his eventual co-operation with police, guilty plea and apology to Oberly’s family in court.
Little said in “standalone” dismemberment cases — in which a person destroys a body but is not involved in the person’s death — punishments typically range from two-year conditional sentences to 18-month jail terms.
Advertisement 5
“Mr. Skelly’s actions were completely misguided, and the way that the crime was carried out was gruesome in the extreme,” Little said. “Nevertheless, he had nothing to gain by it other than a father’s instinct to attempt to protect his son.”
Little concluded that allowing Skelly to serve his sentence at home meets the objectives of sentencing and poses no danger to the public.
“In fact, I am satisfied, given his reference letters and volunteering efforts, that he can further serve the community while serving his sentence,” Little said.
Skelly’s two-year conditional sentence includes 12 months of house arrest. He will then be under a curfew, followed by one year of probation. He is required to attend counselling and AA meetings and must complete 200 hours of community service.
‘Public outcry’
Katherine O’Neill, CEO of YWCA Edmonton, called Skelly’s sentence “disgraceful.”
She said house arrest is “woefully inadequate” when it comes to denouncing what she sees as a crime of gender-based violence.
“I looked at the mitigating factors — the fact he is remorseful, the fact he did plead guilty, the fact he is getting help for an alcohol abuse problem — I get all of that,” she said.
“But at the end of the day, the crime and the severity and the prevalence of gender-based violence in the community should have weighed more heavily in the sentencing here.”
O’Neill said she hopes there is an appeal, as well as “public outcry” over the case.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
20 Comments
Can you believe this?! House arrest for dismembering a body? Outrageous! Justice system fail.
Are we living in a twisted reality where dismembering a body gets house arrest?
Is house arrest a fair punishment for such a heinous crime?
Absolutely not. House arrest is a slap on the wrist for heinous crimes. Real justice requires real consequences. Letting criminals roam freely in their own homes is a mockery of the victims and the legal system. Its time to hold offenders accountable with proper punishment.
Shouldnt justice prioritize the victims familys needs over the offenders convenience?
House arrest for dismembering a body? Outrageous! Justice system needs a reality check.
Shouldnt justice be about punishment, not convenience? Outrageous decision! #JusticeForVictims
Whats next, a slap on the wrist for serious crimes? Outrageous!
Can you believe the nerve of giving house arrest to someone who dismembered a body?
Is house arrest really justice for such a heinous crime? Outrageous decision!
House arrest may seem lenient, but its a form of punishment that ensures the individual is confined and monitored. Its not a vacation. Rehabilitation and monitoring are crucial for the justice system to work effectively. Give it a chance before jumping to conclusions.
Can you believe this? House arrest for dismembering a body? Outrageous!
Shouldnt justice prioritize the victims familys feelings over the perpetrators convenience?
Justice should prioritize fairness and due process for all involved, not just the feelings of one side. Its important to consider the rights and well-being of both the victims families and the perpetrators to ensure a balanced and just outcome.
This decision is outrageous! House arrest for dismembering a body? Seriously? Unbelievable!
Is house arrest a suitable punishment for such a heinous crime?
Can you believe the justice system sometimes? This guy gets house arrest after dismembering a body!
This decision is beyond shocking! How can house arrest be justified here?
Is house arrest appropriate for such a heinous crime? Lets discuss!
House arrest is too lenient for heinous crimes. Prison time ensures justice and protects society. No debate needed.