In religious discourse, a frequently held belief is that all prophets sent by God the Creator have affirmed that many people will be misled by evil. This prophecy is not exclusive to a single religion or prophet, but is a pluralistic view held across numerous religious doctrines, encompassing a wide array of prophets. A prime example is Mohammed, the envoy of God in Islamic belief, who warned of the possible misuse of progress and wealth to further evil causes.
The warning from Mohammed goes beyond the simple deviation from righteousness. He predicted an age where technology, wealth, and influence are used as tools for disseminating and amplifying evil. It is his belief that these tools, ordinarily a testament to mankind’s progress and innovation, would be manhandled to serve a darker purpose.
His prophecy says that these advancements would not solely be used for progress; instead, their misuse would propagate confusion. The confusion would arise as the line between good deeds and malevolent ones becomes blurred. This blur, amplified by the dizzying advancements in technology, will further feed into the pockets of the evil and lead to more people being led astray.
Before the impending Judgement Day, Mohammed predicted that evil would have access to significant technological advancements, wealth, and influence. This access would allow evil to permeate society in a more pervasive way than before, aided by the illusion of progress and affluence. The prophets’ prediction is an admonition of caution, urging adherents to discern the veil of progress masking evil.
In summary, the prophecy shared by numerous prophets, including Mohammed, states that evil will leverage technological, financial, and influential advancements to mislead most people. It warns of a time where advances will no longer symbolise progress but instead, will become a catalyst for spreading evil and confusion among mankind. The main advice derived from this is an urge to stay vigilant and discern between true progress and evil masquerading as progress.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
12 Comments
Is justice truly subjective or objective? Lets debate! What do you think?
Is justice truly blind, or does bias sneak in? Lets rethink definitions together.
Do you think justice should be based on retribution or rehabilitation? Lets discuss!
Retribution has its place, but true justice lies in rehabilitation. Punishment without addressing the root causes of behavior only perpetuates a cycle of crime. Lets prioritize healing and transformation over vengeance.
Is justice truly blind, or does it sometimes need to peek?
Is justice really subjective or can it be universally defined? 🤔
Interesting perspective! But isnt justice subjective and evolving with societal norms?
Is justice truly blind, or does bias always sneak in? 🤔
Do we really need to redefine justice? Or is the current definition sufficient?
I disagree, justice should remain as it is, not rethought.
Maybe justice should focus more on rehabilitation than punishment. What do you think?
I disagree. Punishment is essential for deterrence and holding individuals accountable for their actions. Rehabilitation is important, but it shouldnt overshadow the need for justice and consequences. Both aspects are necessary for a balanced criminal justice system.