Barbados has been a republic for 30 months but has not yet approved a Republican Constitution, causing concern for the Leader of the Opposition, Ralph Thorne SC. He criticized the government for its handling of the Constitution and demanded answers regarding its content and public availability. Thorne emphasized the importance of transparency and public consultation in the process of introducing a new Constitution to ensure that all citizens have the opportunity to review and provide feedback before its implementation.
Thorne expressed frustration over the delay in presenting a fully developed Republican Constitution and called for clarity on the consultation process and decision-making powers within the proposed document. He highlighted the discrepancy between Barbados’ current Republic status and the outdated Westminster content still present in the Constitution, leading to confusion and a lack of clarity in legal matters. Thorne questioned the government’s approach to constitutional reform and urged for a more comprehensive and inclusive process to address these issues effectively.
The absence of a completed Republican Constitution has created challenges for legal professionals in Barbados, with Thorne noting the difficulties faced by lawyers operating within the contradictory framework of Presidentialism and Westminsterism. He criticized the government’s failure to uphold its duty in providing a clear and coherent Constitution that reflects the principles of Republican government. Thorne called for accountability from the Attorney General and demanded transparency in the decision-making process regarding the Constitution Reform Committee’s work.
Despite calls for updates and transparency from various sectors of society, including former Opposition Senators and analysts, the delay in finalizing the Republican Constitution continues to be a point of contention in Barbados. Thorne reiterated the need for a thorough and public consultation process to ensure that the new Constitution accurately reflects the values and principles of Republicanism. He emphasized the importance of ensuring that all citizens have the opportunity to review and provide feedback on the proposed document before its enactment to uphold the principles of democracy and justice.
In conclusion, Thorne criticized the government for its handling of the Republican Constitution and called for greater transparency, public consultation, and accountability in the process. He emphasized the importance of ensuring that the Constitution reflects the values of Republican government and serves the best interests of all citizens in Barbados. Thorne’s remarks highlight the need for a more inclusive and participatory approach to constitutional reform to address the concerns and expectations of the public and legal community in Barbados.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
21 Comments
Thornes stance on Republican Constitution raises interesting points, but is it feasible?
Is Thornes call for a correct Republican constitution in the budget realistic?
Thornes call for a correct Republican constitution in the budget is nothing but wishful thinking. The real world is far from ideal, and politics is a messy game. Idealism has no place in budget negotiations. Its time to get real and focus on practical solutions.
Thornes proposal lacks concrete solutions for budget issues. What about practical steps?
Thornes call for a Republican constitution is bold but necessary. Thoughts?
Is Thornes call for a correct Republican constitution in budget response realistic? Lets discuss!
Thornes call for a correct Republican constitution in the budget response may be ambitious, but its worth exploring. A thorough discussion is key to understanding the feasibility and implications. Lets dive in and see where this proposal could lead us.
Thornes idea might shake things up, but is it really necessary?
Thornes idea on Republican Constitution in budget response is intriguing but controversial.
Is Thornes call for a correct Republican constitution realistic or just wishful thinking?
Thornes call for a Republican constitution is bold but necessary in todays political climate.
Thornes call for Republican constitution is bold, but is it practical in todays politics?
Thornes call for a correct Republican Constitution is a bold move. Agree?
Thornes proposal seems unrealistic, but maybe its time for a change. Thoughts?
I dont get why Thorne is so obsessed with a correct Republican Constitution.
Thornes idea could shake up the status quo – worth considering, right?
Thornes idea is a game-changer. Its time to challenge the status quo and embrace innovation. Lets not settle for the same old routine. This could be the breakthrough weve been waiting for. Count me in for shaking things up!
I dont understand why Thorne is pushing for a Republican Constitution in the budget.
Do you think Thornes call for a correct Republican constitution is realistic?
Thornes idea of a Correct Republican Constitution is intriguing but needs clarity.
Thornes idea of a Correct Republican Constitution is indeed intriguing, but clarity is crucial for its credibility. Without clear definitions and explanations, the concept risks becoming vague and open to misinterpretation. Its essential to clearly outline the principles and provisions of such a constitution for it to be truly effective.