A trial date has been set for Daniel Penny, a Marine Corps veteran and college student charged with manslaughter in the chokehold death of Jordan Neely on a New York City subway train. The incident, which was captured on video, showed Neely threatening passengers, prompting Penny to restrain him in a chokehold until the train reached the next station. Penny’s trial is scheduled to begin on Oct. 8 and is expected to last for four to six weeks. One witness described Penny as a “hero” and expressed fear for their lives during the incident.
The court documents reveal that Penny told police that Neely was behaving erratically and threatening passengers before he intervened. Additionally, Neely had a documented history of mental illness and previous subway assaults. Penny initially cooperated with police but turned himself in 11 days later when he was charged with manslaughter by District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office. His defense team argues that in situations where force is used or threatened against riders, those who defend themselves may end up facing legal consequences.
Lennon Edwards, the attorney representing Neely’s family, emphasized that Neely was unarmed during the incident and argued that emotional distress does not equate to being dangerous. Edwards expressed confidence in the upcoming trial and suggested that Penny acted as the “judge, jury, and executioner” in this case. Penny, if convicted, could face up to 15 years in prison for second-degree manslaughter. Transit crime in New York City has continued to be a concern, with recent incidents of violence on subways prompting increased security measures.
The case involving Daniel Penny highlights the complex legal and ethical considerations surrounding self-defense and intervention in violent situations. The witness testimonies paint a conflicting picture of the events leading up to Neely’s death, with some describing Penny as a hero and others questioning the necessity of his actions. The impending trial will likely delve into these nuances and determine the legality of Penny’s actions in the context of the situation he faced on the subway train. Edwards remains optimistic about the outcome of the trial and expresses hope that justice will be served for Neely and his family.
In response to recent subway incidents, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has deployed additional security measures to address transit crime in the city. The presence of the National Guard and state troopers aims to deter criminal behavior and ensure the safety of passengers. The tragic events surrounding Neely’s death and subsequent incidents underscore the ongoing challenges faced by public transportation systems and the need for comprehensive strategies to address safety concerns. The upcoming trial of Daniel Penny will serve as a critical legal proceeding in determining accountability and justice for all parties involved in this tragic incident.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
9 Comments
Do you think the trial date was set too soon or not soon enough?
I believe the trial date was set appropriately. Justice delayed is justice denied. Its important to move forward with legal proceedings in a timely manner to ensure all parties involved can seek closure and move on with their lives.
Do you think the trial date for Daniel Penny is fair? Lets discuss!
I believe the trial date for Daniel Penny is fair. Justice delayed is justice denied. The legal system has processes in place to ensure a fair trial. Lets trust in the judicial system and refrain from casting doubt without all the facts.
Do you think the trial will bring justice or just more chaos?
I wonder if the judge will consider all the evidence fairly. Lets see!
Do you think the trial will bring justice or just more controversy?
Do you think the trial will bring justice or more controversy?
What do you think about the judges decision in this case? Fair or not?