A 40-year-old man from Snohomish County, who is a member of the Tulalip Tribes, was sentenced to three years of probation, with intermittent confinement for the first year, for involuntary manslaughter in connection with a crash that killed his sole passenger in 2020. Danny Lee Simpson, Jr. pleaded guilty in October 2023. Simpson had been drinking with his wife and a friend at a bar in Stanwood, Washington before driving his truck to a gravel pit owned by his parents. Due to recent modifications to his truck and a lack of brake system check, the truck stalled and crashed off a 40-foot cliff, killing the passenger.
Prosecutors sought an 18-month custodial sentence for Simpson, while the United States Probation Office recommended 28 months. In his plea agreement, Simpson admitted to knowing the dangers of driving under the influence of alcohol near a cliff face in a poorly lit gravel pit. The victim’s family expressed the devastating impact of their loss, with the victim’s mother speaking about the pain they have endured. The victim’s father also shared a victim impact statement, expressing the continuous and paralyzing pain he feels for his son and grandson.
Simpson was ordered to pay restitution to the victim’s family, the amount to be determined at a later date. The sentencing hearing allowed the victim’s family to speak about the devastating impact of Simpson’s actions on their lives and the community. The crash not only took away the life of the victim but also robbed him of the opportunity to watch his son grow up and experience important milestones. Simpson’s decision to drive under the influence led to irreversible consequences for the victim’s loved ones.
The case was investigated by the FBI and the Tulalip Police Department, with Assistant United States Attorneys J. Tate London and Jocelyn Cooney prosecuting the case. Both attorneys serve as Tribal Liaisons for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Western District of Washington. The sentencing of Simpson serves as a reminder of the dangers of driving under the influence and the devastating impact it can have on individuals and families. The consequences of careless decisions can lead to irreversible harm and loss for those involved.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
21 Comments
Shouldnt the sentence be harsher for such a serious crime?
Is intermittent custody a fair punishment for a fatal drunk driving crash?
Wow, should the punishment have been harsher for the drunk driving crash?
Why was the sentence so lenient for such a serious crime?
Wow, do you think intermittent custody is a fair punishment for a fatal drunk driving crash?
Shouldnt the punishment be harsher for taking a life while driving drunk?
Absolutely. Driving drunk and causing a death is a reckless and selfish act that warrants severe consequences. Harsher punishments are necessary to send a clear message that this behavior will not be tolerated. Its a matter of holding individuals accountable for their actions and protecting innocent lives.
Shouldnt the sentence be harsher considering the fatal consequences?
This sentence seems too light for a fatal crash. Justice system fail?
Justice can be complex. We cant judge the entire system based on one sentence. Investigations, evidence, and legal proceedings all play a role. Lets trust in the process before jumping to conclusions.
How can justice be served with intermittent custody for a fatal drunk driving crash?
Shouldnt the punishment be harsher for taking a life while drunk driving?
Harsher punishment wont deter drunk driving. Education, prevention, and rehabilitation are key. Lets focus on addressing the root of the problem rather than just increasing penalties. People need help, not just punishment.
I cant believe the lenient sentence for such a serious crime. Justice failed here.
Justice may not always meet our expectations, but we must trust the legal system to make fair decisions based on all factors involved. We cant fully understand the complexities of every case from the outside looking in. Trust the process.
Do you think the punishment fits the crime in this case?
Shouldnt the sentencing be harsher for a fatal drunk driving crash?
Shouldnt the justice system focus more on rehabilitation than punishment in cases like this?
Shouldnt the punishment be stricter for a fatal drunk driving crash?
Can we really trust the justice system to handle cases like this fairly?
Trust in the justice system is subjective and varies case by case. While flaws exist, its essential to seek justice through proper channels. Questioning the system is valid, but blanket distrust isnt productive. Lets advocate for reform rather than dismiss the entire system.