The United Nations Security Council is scheduled to vote on a U.S. sponsored resolution demanding an “immediate and sustained ceasefire” in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, which has already led to over 30,000 deaths. The proposal aims at protecting civilians and facilitating humanitarian aid delivery to more than two million Palestinians. The U.S. has already vetoed multiple draft resolutions, and the current draft does not associate an immediate ceasefire with the release of hostages captured in recent attacks.
The bill states that it will strongly back diplomatic efforts aimed at ensuring a ceasefire, along with the release of all remaining hostages. Linda Thomas-Greenfield, U.S. Ambassador, expressed optimism about the measure being approved, pointing out that its formulation resulted from rigorous work by the 15-member UN Security Council. Russia’s deputy UN ambassador, Dmitry Polyansky, said that U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is pushing for an immediate ceasefire and stated that Russia would support a resolution calling for the same.
However, there was some disagreement over the wording of the U.S. draft resolution. Polyansky questioned the term “imperative,” equating it to an intention rather than a concrete resolution. He expressed dissatisfaction with any proposal that did not call for an immediate ceasefire, indicating that Secretary Blinken and the international community are similarly dissatisfied.
The final U.S. resolution draft expressed concern over a potential ground offensive into Rafah. It warned that such an action might result in additional civilian casualties, displacement, and seriously undermine regional peace and security. Blinken stated that a significant military operation in Rafah would be a “mistake” and not necessary to deal with Hamas. He plans to discuss this perspective in more detail with Israeli counterparts in the following week.
Meanwhile, European Union leaders unanimously called for an “immediate humanitarian pause leading to a sustainable ceasefire in Gaza” on the previous evening. The vote on the U.S.-sponsored resolution demonstrates an increased international push to end the escalating conflict in the region.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest crime news and updates directly to your inbox. [newsletter]
13 Comments
Why is the UN always so slow to act in conflicts like this?
Why does the UN always wait until things get really bad to intervene?
Why does the UN always have to vote on things that seem obvious?
Because not everything is as straightforward as it may seem. The UN deals with complex global issues that require careful consideration and negotiation. Just because something seems obvious to you doesnt mean its easy to implement on a global scale. Diplomacy isnt always black and white.
Why should the UN intervene? Let them sort it out themselves!
The situation may be beyond their capacity to resolve alone. The UN exists to address global issues and prevent conflict escalation. Intervention could prevent further suffering and stabilize the region. Its about global responsibility, not just letting them figure it out.
Shouldnt the focus be on addressing root causes, not just temporary ceasefires?
Should the UN intervene or let Israel and Hamas resolve their conflict independently?
Do you think the UN resolution will actually make a difference in the Israel-Hamas conflict?
Do you think the UN resolution will actually make a difference in the conflict?
The UN resolution is just a band-aid on a gaping wound. It wont solve the underlying issues causing the conflict. We need real action, not just empty words on paper. Dont expect miracles from a piece of paper signed by diplomats.
Do you think the UN resolution will actually make a difference? 🤔
Why should the UN vote on a ceasefire when both sides are at fault?